Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32884390›Full record

ArticleClinical Medicine Insights. Oncology2020

Efficacy of Docetaxel Plus Ramucirumab as Palliative Third-Line Therapy Following Second-Line Immune-Checkpoint-Inhibitor Treatment in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Stage IV.

Wolfgang M Brueckl, Martin Reck, Achim Rittmeyer, Jens Kollmeier, Claas Wesseler, Gunther H Wiest, Petros Christopoulos, Amanda Tufman, Petra Hoffknecht, Bernhard Ulm and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Wolfgang M BruecklNuremberg Lung Cancer Center, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergology and Sleep Medicine, General Hospital Nuremberg, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7039-0791
Martin ReckLungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Großhansdorf, Germany.
Achim RittmeyerAmbulanz für pneumologische Onkologie, Lungenfachklinik Immenhausen, Kassel, Germany.
Jens KollmeierLungenklinik Heckeshorn, Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring, Berlin, Germany.
Claas WesselerAsklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, Asklepios Klinikum Harburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Gunther H WiestAsklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, Asklepios Klinikum Harburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Petros ChristopoulosThoraxklinik-Heidelberg gGmbH, Thoraxonkologie, Heidelberg, Germany.
Amanda TufmanMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik V (Pneumologie), Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Petra HoffknechtZentrum Klinik für Thoraxonkologie im Franziskus-Hospital Harderberg, Georgsmarienhütte, Germany.
Bernhard UlmUnabhängige statistische Beratung Bernhard Ulm, Munich, Germany.
Fabian ReichNuremberg Lung Cancer Center, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergology and Sleep Medicine, General Hospital Nuremberg, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany.
Joachim H FickerNuremberg Lung Cancer Center, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergology and Sleep Medicine, General Hospital Nuremberg, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany.
Eckart LaackHämato-Onkologie Hamburg, Praxis, Hamburg, Germany.
Nuremberg Hospital · DEAsklepios Klinikum Harburg · DEHelios Klinikum Emil von Behring · DELMU Klinikum · DELungenClinic Grosshansdorf · DEStatistisches Bundesamt · DESt. Franziskus Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntiangiogenic agents have been shown to stimulate the immune system and cause synergistic effects with chemotherapy. Effects might be even stronger after immune-checkpoint-inhibitor (ICI) therapy. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of ramucirumab plus docetaxel (R + D) as third-line treatment after failure of a first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and a second-line ICI treatment in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) stage IV.

methodsRetrospective data were collected from 9 German thoracic oncology centers. Only patients who had received at least 1 cycle of third-line R + D were included. The numbers of cycles, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were investigated.

resultsSixty-seven patients met the criteria for inclusion. Third-line treatment with R + D achieved an ORR of 36% and a disease control rate (DCR) of 69%. Median PFS for third-line therapy was 6.8 months with a duration of response (DOR) of 10.2 months. A median OS of 29 months was observed from the start of first-line therapy with a median OS of 11.0 months from the start of third-line treatment. No unexpected toxicities occurred.

conclusionR + D is a highly effective and safe third-line treatment after failure of second-line programmed cell death protein 1/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD1/PD-L1)-derived ICI therapy irrespective of NSCLC histology. As there may be synergistic effects of second- and third-line treatments, this sequence is a very suitable option for patients not treated with first-line ICI. In addition, R + D should continue to be investigated as a second-line treatment option after failure of chemotherapy plus ICI in the palliative first-line treatment.

Indexed as

angiogenesis inhibitorimmune checkpoint inhibitorLung cancerpalliative treatmentramucirumab

Identifiers

PMID32884390
PMCPMC7440727
OpenAlexW3057342925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.