Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32884253›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2020

Early Clinically Important Improvement (ECII) and Exacerbation Outcomes in COPD Patients.

Konstantinos Kostikas, Alexander J Mackay, Claus F Vogelmeier, Stefan-Marian Frent, Pritam Gupta, Donald Banerji, Francesco Patalano, Pascal J Pfister, Jadwiga A Wedzicha

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06170125 (A Multicenter, Non-interventional, Observational Clinical Trial to Assess the Quality of Life in Patients With ChRonic ObstructIve Pulmonary Disease Who Require Tiotropium as additiOnal treatmeNt.), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06170125 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Multicenter, Non-interventional, Observational Clinical Trial to Assess the Quality of Life in Patients With ChRonic ObstructIve Pulmonary Disease Who Require Tiotropium as additiOnal treatmeNt.

TypeobservationalSponsorElpen Pharmaceutical Co. Inc.Ran2024 to 2026Enrolled500ConditionsCOPDArmsTiotropium treated patients
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

Konstantinos KostikasRespiratory Medicine Department, University of Ioannina Medical School, Ioannina, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-0774-3942
Alexander J MackayNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Claus F VogelmeierDepartment of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Marburg, Germany.
Stefan-Marian FrentDepartment of Pulmonology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-7469-6755
Pritam GuptaNovartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad, India.
Donald BanerjiNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Francesco PatalanoNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7015-6084
Pascal J PfisterNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2276-5042
Jadwiga A WedzichaRespiratory Clinical Science Section, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Imperial College London · GBNovartis (Switzerland) · CHNovartis (India) · INNovartis (United States) · USPhilipps University of Marburg · DEUniversity of Ioannina · GRWest University of Timişoara · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations are difficult outcomes to measure in clinical trials. It would be valuable to be able to predict which patients are likely to benefit in terms of exacerbation prevention based on their early response in lung function and symptoms. Methods: This was a post-hoc analysis from the 52-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, non-inferiority FLAME trial. Early clinically important improvement (ECII) was defined as achievement of minimal clinically important difference in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV Results: Approximately 18-20% of patients achieved ECII at Week 4 or 12 post-randomization according to any of the two definitions. The rate of subsequent exacerbations was lower in patients who achieved ECII at Week 4 (D1: ratio of rates [95% CI], 0.85 [0.74 to 0.98]; D2, 0.88 [0.77 to 1.00]) or at Week 12 (D1, 0.85 [0.74 to 0.98]; D2, 0.86 [0.75 to 1.00]) versus patients not achieving ECII. Patients who achieved ECII experienced longer time-to-first exacerbation between Week 4 or 12 to end of study. More patients achieved ECII with indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus salmeterol/fluticasone according to both definitions at Week 4 (D1, odds ratio [95% CI], 1.69 [1.40 to 2.04]; D2, 1.61 [1.34 to 1.93]), and 12 (D1, 2.01 [1.66 to 2.44]; D2, 1.80 [1.48 to 2.18]). Conclusion: ECII is a novel composite endpoint, based on clinically relevant improvement in lung function and PROs in the early phase of treatment intervention that may predict subsequent exacerbation risk and may be used in clinical trials.

Indexed as

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsBronchodilator AgentsDouble-Blind MethodForced Expiratory VolumeGlycopyrrolateHumansMuscarinic AntagonistsTreatment OutcomeAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsBronchodilator AgentsGlycopyrrolateMuscarinic AntagonistsECIIexacerbationsindacaterol/glycopyrroniumlung functionPROs

Identifiers

PMID32884253
PMCPMC7435751
OpenAlexW3044993546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.