Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32884236›Full record

ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2020

Assessment of a New Ginsenoside Rh2 Nanoniosomal Formulation for Enhanced Antitumor Efficacy on Prostate Cancer: An in vitro Study.

Hadi Zare-Zardini, Ashraf Alemi, Asghar Taheri-Kafrani, Seyed Ahmad Hosseini, Hossein Soltaninejad, Amir Ali Hamidieh, Mojtaba Haghi Karamallah, Majid Farrokhifar, Mohammad Farrokhifar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Influence ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Rapid Identification of Characteristic Chemical Constituents ofJournal of analytical methods in chemistry · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Hadi Zare-ZardiniHematology and Oncology Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-1501-2560
Ashraf AlemiAbadan Faculty of Medical Sciences, Abadan, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-1780-7540
Asghar Taheri-KafraniDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Advanced Sciences and Technologies, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
Seyed Ahmad HosseiniNutrition and Metabolic Diseases Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Hossein SoltaninejadTissue Bank & Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Amir Ali HamidiehStem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mojtaba Haghi KaramallahShoushtar Faculty of Medical Sciences, Shoushtar, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-7099-9767
Majid FarrokhifarDepartment of Pediatrics, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran.
Mohammad FarrokhifarKar Higher Education Institute of Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan, Iran.
Hadaf Institute of Higher Education · IRAhvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences · IRIslamic Azad University, Shoushtar Branch · IRShahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services · IRTarbiat Modares University · IRTehran University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Isfahan · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGinsenoside Rh2, purified from the

methodsThe niosomal formulation contained Span 60 and cholesterol, and cationic lipid DOTAP was evaluated by determining particle size distribution, encapsulation efficiency, the polydispersity index (PDI), and surface morphology. The cytotoxic effects of free Ginsenoside Rh2 and Ginsenoside Rh2-loaded niosomes were determined using the MTT method in the PC3 prostate cancer cell line. For the investigation of the in vitro cellular uptake of Ginsenoside Rh2-loaded niosome, two formulations were prepared: the Ginsenoside Rh2-loaded niosomal formula containing 5% DOTAP and the Ginsenoside Rh2-loaded niosomal formula without DOTAP.

resultsThe mean size, DPI, zeta potential, and encapsulation efficiency of the Ginsenoside Rh2-loaded nanoniosomal formulation containing DOTAP were 93.5±2.1 nm, 0.203±0.01, +4.65±0.65, and 98.32% ±2.4, respectively. The niosomal vesicles were found to be round and have a smooth surface. The release profile of Ginsenoside Rh2 from niosome was biphasic. Furthermore, a two-fold reduction in the Ginsenoside Rh2 concentration was measured when Ginsenoside Rh2 was administered in a nanoniosomal form compared to free Ginsenoside Rh2 solutions in the PC3 prostate cancer cell line. After storage for 90 days, the encapsulation efficiency, vesicle size, PDI, and zeta potential of the optimized formulation did not significantly change compared to the freshly prepared samples. The cellular uptake experiments of the niosomal formulation demonstrated that by adding DOTAP to the niosomal formulation, the cellular uptake was enhanced. DISCUSSION: The enhanced cellular uptake and cytotoxic activity of the Ginsenoside Rh2 nanoniosomal formulation on the PC3 cell make it an attractive candidate for application as a nano-sized delivery vehicle to transfer Ginsenoside Rh2 to cancer cells.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCell ProliferationCell SurvivalCholesterolDrug CompoundingDrug LiberationDrugs, Chinese HerbalDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorFatty Acids, MonounsaturatedGinsenosidesHexosesHumansLiposomesMalePanaxParticle Size1,2-dioleoyloxy-3-(trimethylammonium)propaneAntineoplastic AgentsCholesterolDrugs, Chinese HerbalFatty Acids, Monounsaturatedginsenoside Rh2GinsenosidesHexosesLiposomesQuaternary Ammonium Compoundssorbitan monostearatechemotherapyGinsenoside Rh2nanoniosomalPC3 prostate cancer cell line

Identifiers

PMID32884236
PMCPMC7431455
OpenAlexW3048412767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.