Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32884126›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Rheumatology2020

New insights into the role of antinuclear antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus.

David S Pisetsky, Peter E Lipsky

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Rheumatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 174 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
174citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
25.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

174 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 290 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Targeting FcRn for immunomodulation: a promising therapy in autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Diversity in clinical Trials: The example of systemic lupus erythematosus.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

114 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David S PisetskyDepartments of Medicine and Immunology, Duke University Medical Center and Medical Research Service, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. david.pisetsky@duke.edu.
Peter E LipskyRILITE Research Institute, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9287-1676
Ampel BioSolutions (United States) · USDuke Medical Center · US

Funding

Engineering Polymers to Scavenge DAMPs in Arthritis and LupusR01AR073935 · NIAMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LEONG, KAM W, SULLENGER, BRUCE ALAN · 2018 to 2022
$3.3M
Cellular Sources of Self Antigen in SLEI01BX003772 · VA · DURHAM VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI PISETSKY, DAVID STEPHEN · 2018 to 2021
–
BLRD VA I01 BX003772NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR073935
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a prototypic autoimmune disease characterized by antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) that form immune complexes that mediate pathogenesis by tissue deposition or cytokine induction. Some ANAs bind DNA or associated nucleosome proteins, whereas other ANAs bind protein components of complexes of RNA and RNA-binding proteins (RBPs). Levels of anti-DNA antibodies can fluctuate widely, unlike those of anti-RBP antibodies, which tend to be stable. Because anti-DNA antibody levels can reflect disease activity, repeat testing is common; by contrast, a single anti-RBP antibody determination is thought to suffice for clinical purposes. Experience from clinical trials of novel therapies has provided a new perspective on ANA expression during disease, as many patients with SLE are ANA negative at screening despite previously testing positive. Because trial results suggest that patients who are ANA negative might not respond to certain agents, screening strategies now involve ANA and anti-DNA antibody testing to identify patients with so-called 'active, autoantibody-positive SLE'. Evidence suggests that ANA responses can decrease over time because of the natural history of disease or the effects of therapy. Together, these findings suggest that, during established disease, more regular serological testing could illuminate changes relevant to pathogenesis and disease status.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsAntibodies, AntinuclearAutoantibodiesBiomarkersClinical Trials as TopicCytokinesDNAGlomerulonephritisHumansLupus Erythematosus, SystemicMass ScreeningMiceMiddle AgedModels, AnimalAntibodies, AntinuclearAutoantibodiesBiomarkersCytokinesDNANucleosomesRNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID32884126
PMCPMC8456518
OpenAlexW3082789052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.