Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32884104›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2021

Comprehensive evaluation of risk factors for neonatal hearing loss in a large Brazilian cohort.

Adriana R T Anastasio, Aparecida Y Yamamoto, Eduardo T Massuda, Alessandra K S Manfredi, Juliana M S Cavalcante, Bruno C P Lopes, Davi C Aragon, Suresh Boppana, Karen B Fowler, William J Britt and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Risk factors for infant hearing loss: a meta-analysis.European journal of pediatrics · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Adriana R T AnastasioDepartment of Health Sciences, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. anastasi@fmrp.usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9347-5248
Aparecida Y YamamotoDepartment of Pediatrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eduardo T MassudaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology, and Head and Neck Surgery, Ribeirão Preto Medical School-University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3441-5709
Alessandra K S ManfrediDepartment of Health Sciences, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Juliana M S CavalcanteDepartment of Health Sciences, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Bruno C P LopesDepartment of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology, and Head and Neck Surgery, Ribeirão Preto Medical School-University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Davi C AragonDepartment of Pediatrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Suresh BoppanaDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
Karen B FowlerDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
William J BrittDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
Marisa M Mussi-PinhataDepartment of Pediatrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8985-1570
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversidade de Ribeirão Preto · BR

Funding

CMV Vaccines: Reinfection and Antigenic Variation (Vision and auditory screening in infants born to women enrolled in ZIP)R01HD061959 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BRITT, WILLIAM JARVIS, MUSSI-PINHATA, MARISA MARCIA · 2011 to 2023
$5.9M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD061959
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine the incidence and risk factors of hearing loss (HL) in Brazilian neonates. STUDY

design11,900 neonates were screened for hearing and congenital CMV (cCMV). Low and high-risk babies who did not pass their hearing screening and infants with cCMV were scheduled for a diagnostic audiologic evaluation.

resultsThe incidence of HL was 2 per 1000 live-born infants (95% CI: 1-3). HL was higher in high-risk neonates than in low risk babies (18.6 vs. 0.3/1000 live births, respectively). Among infants exposed to isolated risk factors, association of HL with craniofacial abnormalities/syndromes (RR = 24.47; 95% CI: 5.9-100.9) and cCMV (RR = 9.54; 95% CI: 3.3-27.7) were observed. HL was 20 to 100-fold more likely in neonates exposed to ototoxic drugs in combination with cCMV or craniofacial/congenital anomalies.

conclusionsStrategies for the prevention of cCMV and exposure to ototoxic drugs may decrease the incidence of HL in this population.

Indexed as

Cytomegalovirus InfectionsHearing LossHearing TestsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornNeonatal ScreeningRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID32884104
OpenAlexW3081999841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.