Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32884065›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2020

Evolution of antibiotic resistance at low antibiotic concentrations including selection below the minimal selective concentration.

Isobel C Stanton, Aimee K Murray, Lihong Zhang, Jason Snape, William H Gaze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. ASP-COMPLEX: redefining antimicrobial stewardship to improve outcomes in high-risk patients with severe infections.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Antibiotic resistance inFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Isobel C StantonEuropean Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter Medical School, ESI, University of Exeter, Penyrn Campus, Penryn, Cornwall, TR10 9EF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2700-2407
Aimee K MurrayEuropean Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter Medical School, ESI, University of Exeter, Penyrn Campus, Penryn, Cornwall, TR10 9EF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1388-754X
Lihong ZhangEuropean Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter Medical School, ESI, University of Exeter, Penyrn Campus, Penryn, Cornwall, TR10 9EF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5931-9118
Jason SnapeAstraZeneca, Alderley Edge, Cambridge, Cheshire, SK10 4TG, UK.
William H GazeEuropean Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter Medical School, ESI, University of Exeter, Penyrn Campus, Penryn, Cornwall, TR10 9EF, UK. W.H.Gaze@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9345-6204

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L502509/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N504026/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining the selective potential of antibiotics at environmental concentrations is critical for designing effective strategies to limit selection for antibiotic resistance. This study determined the minimal selective concentrations (MSCs) for macrolide and fluoroquinolone antibiotics included on the European Commission's Water Framework Directive's priority hazardous substances Watch List. The macrolides demonstrated positive selection for ermF at concentrations 1-2 orders of magnitude greater (>500 and <750 µg/L) than measured environmental concentrations (MECs). Ciprofloxacin illustrated positive selection for intI1 at concentrations similar to current MECs (>7.8 and <15.6 µg/L). This highlights the need for compound specific assessment of selective potential. In addition, a sub-MSC selective window defined by the minimal increased persistence concentration (MIPC) is described. Differential rates of negative selection (or persistence) were associated with elevated prevalence relative to the no antibiotic control below the MSC. This increased persistence leads to opportunities for further selection over time and risk of human exposure and environmental transmission.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, MicrobialAnti-Bacterial AgentsDose-Response Relationship, DrugEvolution, MolecularHumansMacrolidesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSelection, GeneticWater MicrobiologyAnti-Bacterial AgentsMacrolides

Identifiers

PMID32884065
PMCPMC7471295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.