Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32884062›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Reconstruction of the respiratory signal through ECG and wrist accelerometer data.

Julian Leube, Johannes Zschocke, Maria Kluge, Luise Pelikan, Antonia Graf, Martin Glos, Alexander Müller, Ronny P Bartsch, Thomas Penzel, Jan W Kantelhardt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Julian LeubeInstitute of Physics, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, 06099, Halle, Germany.
Johannes ZschockeInstitute of Physics, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, 06099, Halle, Germany.
Maria KlugeInterdisziplinäres Schlafmedizinisches Zentrum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Luise PelikanInterdisziplinäres Schlafmedizinisches Zentrum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Antonia GrafInterdisziplinäres Schlafmedizinisches Zentrum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Martin GlosInterdisziplinäres Schlafmedizinisches Zentrum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Alexander MüllerKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin I, Technische Universität München, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Ronny P BartschDepartment of Physics, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, 5290002, Israel.
Thomas PenzelInterdisziplinäres Schlafmedizinisches Zentrum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Jan W KantelhardtInstitute of Physics, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, 06099, Halle, Germany. jan.kantelhardt@physik.uni-halle.de.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DEBar-Ilan University · ILSaratov State University · RUTechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Respiratory rate and changes in respiratory activity provide important markers of health and fitness. Assessing the breathing signal without direct respiratory sensors can be very helpful in large cohort studies and for screening purposes. In this paper, we demonstrate that long-term nocturnal acceleration measurements from the wrist yield significantly better respiration proxies than four standard approaches of ECG (electrocardiogram) derived respiration. We validate our approach by comparison with flow-derived respiration as standard reference signal, studying the full-night data of 223 subjects in a clinical sleep laboratory. Specifically, we find that phase synchronization indices between respiration proxies and the flow signal are large for five suggested acceleration-derived proxies with [Formula: see text] for males and [Formula: see text] for females (means ± standard deviations), while ECG-derived proxies yield only [Formula: see text] for males and [Formula: see text] for females. Similarly, respiratory rates can be determined more precisely by wrist-worn acceleration devices compared with a derivation from the ECG. As limitation we must mention that acceleration-derived respiration proxies are only available during episodes of non-physical activity (especially during sleep).

Indexed as

AccelerometryElectrocardiographyHumansRespiratory RateSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedWrist Joint

Identifiers

PMID32884062
PMCPMC7471298
OpenAlexW3082434756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.