Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32883742›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2020

Comprehensive Genomic Profiling of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (GEP-NENs).

Alberto Puccini, Kelsey Poorman, Mohamed E Salem, Davide Soldato, Andreas Seeber, Richard M Goldberg, Anthony F Shields, Joanne Xiu, Francesca Battaglin, Martin D Berger and 12 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Elucidating DNA Damage-Dependent Immune System Activation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  15. Metabolic changes in neuroendocrine neoplasms.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Alberto PucciniNorris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0002-2492-4043
Kelsey PoormanCaris Life Sciences, Phoenix, Arizona.
Mohamed E SalemLevine Cancer Institute, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Davide SoldatoUniversity of Genoa, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino IRCCS, Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2090-3245
Andreas SeeberDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Innsbruck, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Richard M GoldbergWest Virginia University Cancer Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia.ORCID 0000-0003-0308-8223
Anthony F ShieldsDepartment of Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.ORCID 0000-0002-9122-1014
Joanne XiuCaris Life Sciences, Phoenix, Arizona.
Francesca BattaglinNorris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Martin D BergerNorris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Ryuma TokunagaNorris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Madiha NaseemNorris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Afsaneh BarziNorris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0002-0032-2988
Syma IqbalNorris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Wu ZhangNorris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Shivani SoniNorris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Jimmy J HwangLevine Cancer Institute, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Philip A PhilipWest Virginia University Cancer Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Stefania ScialleroUniversity of Genoa, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino IRCCS, Genoa, Italy.
W Michael KornCaris Life Sciences, Phoenix, Arizona.ORCID 0000-0002-0124-6841
John L MarshallRuesch Center for The Cure of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, D.C.ORCID 0000-0002-3449-2344
Heinz-Josef LenzNorris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California. lenz@med.usc.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2178-9568
University of Southern California · USCaris Life Sciences (United States) · USCarolinas Healthcare System · USOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITWest Virginia University · USGeorgetown University · USInnsbruck Medical University · ATThe Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute · US

Funding

USC/NORRIS COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER (CORE) SUPPORTP30CA014089 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MYLES G COCKBURN · 1985 to 2026
$181.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGEP-NENs are rare malignancies with increasing incidence. Their molecular characteristics are still undefined. We explored the underlying biology of GEP-NENs and the differences between gastrointestinal (GI) and pancreatic (PNEN), high-grade (HG), and low-grade (LG) tumors. EXPERIMENTAL

designGEP-NENs were analyzed using next-generation sequencing (NGS; MiSeq on 47 genes, NextSeq on 592 genes), IHC, and

resultsIn total, 724 GEP-NENs were examined: GI (

conclusionsSignificant molecular differences were observed in GEP-NENs by tumor location and grade, indicating differences in carcinogenic pathways and biology.

Indexed as

GenomicsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansIntestinal NeoplasmsMaleMicrosatellite InstabilityMiddle AgedMutation, MissenseNeoplasm ProteinsNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorBRAF protein, humanNeoplasm ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf

Identifiers

PMID32883742
PMCPMC8970533
OpenAlexW3083599586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.