Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32883730›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Models of support to family members during the trajectory of cancer: a scoping review protocol.

Maria Samuelsson, Anne Wennick, Jenny Jakobsson, Mariette Bengtsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maria SamuelssonDepartment of Care Science, Malmö Universitet, Malmö, Skåne, Sweden maria.samuelsson@mau.se.ORCID 0000-0001-8700-4490
Anne WennickFaculty of Health and Society, Care Science, Malmö University, Malmö, Skåne, Sweden.
Jenny JakobssonDepartment of Care Science, Malmö Universitet, Malmö, Skåne, Sweden.
Mariette BengtssonCare Science, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA cancer diagnose, for example, colorectal cancer, not only affects the cancer-person stricken, but also the surrounding family. Thus, this scoping review intends to identify appropriate models of support that will guide the development of a model of support to family members during the trajectory of colorectal cancer. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This scoping review will be guided by the methodological framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley, refined by Levac ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Being a secondary analysis, ethical approval is not needed for this study. The findings of the analysis will be used to inform the design of a future study aiming to develop a model of support and an upcoming scoping review, which will be published in a scientific journal and presented at relevant conferences.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareNeoplasmsFamilyHumansPeer ReviewResearch DesignScoping Reviews as Topicadult oncologyprotocols & guidelinesquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID32883730
PMCPMC7473623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.