SynthesisBMJ open gastroenterology2020
Efficacy of second-line regimens for
Synthesis in BMJ open gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment ofThe Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2026Guideline
- Guideline
- Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Korea: 2025 Revised Edition.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2026Review
- Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Korea: An Evidence-Based Analysis of the Upcoming 2025 Guideline.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2026Review
- Differences and trends in worldwide clinical guidelines forTranslational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
- Current Understanding of Optimal Prevention of Helicobacter pylori-Induced Cancer.Gastroenterology clinics of North America · 2025Review
- Prevalence ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Real-World Situation of Eradication Regimens and Risk Factors forClinical and experimental gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations onPrzeglad gastroenterologiczny · 2023Article
- Levofloxacin versus clarithromycin for Helicobacter pylori eradication: are 14 day regimens better than 10 day regimens?Gut pathogens · 2022Article
- Empiric "Three-in-One" Bismuth Quadruple Therapy for Second-LineAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Practice guidelines for the management ofSaudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrent guidelines recommend bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (BQT) and quinolone-containing therapy after failure of first-line
methodsThree major bibliographic databases were reviewed to enrol relevant randomised controlled trials between January 2000 and September 2018. Network meta-analysis was conducted by STATA software and we performed subgroup analysis in countries with high clarithromycin resistance and high levofloxacin resistance, and in patients with documented failure of first-line triple therapy.
resultsFifty-four studies totalling 8752 participants who received 16 regimens were eligible for analysis. Compared with a 7-day BQT, use of probiotic add-on therapy during, before, and after second-line antibiotic regimens, quinolone-based sequential therapy for 10-14 days, quinolone-based bismuth quadruple therapy for 10-14 days, bismuth quadruple therapy for 10-14 days, and quinolone-based triple therapy for 10-14 days were significantly superior to the other regimens. Subgroup analysis of countries with high clarithromycin resistance and high levofloxacin resistance revealed that the ranking of second-line eradication regimens was distributed similarly in each group, as well as in patients with failure of first-line triple therapy.
conclusionWe conducted a detailed comparison of second-line
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.