Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32883579›Full record

ArticleJoint Commission journal on quality and patient safety2020

Development and Validation of WeCares, a Survey Instrument to Assess Hospitalized Patients' and Family Members' "Willingness to Engage in Your Care and Safety".

Po-Yin Yen, Lisa Soleymani Lehmann, Julia Snyder, Kumiko Schnock, Brittany Couture, Ann Smith, Nicole Pearl, Esteban Gershanik, William Martinez, Patricia C Dykes and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Patient engagement in care: A scoping review of recently validated tools assessing patients' and healthcare professionals' preferences and experience.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Po-Yin Yen
Lisa Soleymani Lehmann
Julia Snyder
Kumiko Schnock
Brittany Couture
Ann Smith
Nicole Pearl
Esteban Gershanik
William Martinez
Patricia C Dykes
David W Bates
Sarah Collins Rossetti
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · USBarnes-Jewish College · USColumbia University · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

NIA NIH HHS L30 AG051270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient engagement is recognized as a method to improve care quality and safety. A research team developed WeCares (Willingness to Engage in Your Care and Safety), a survey instrument assessing patients' and families' engagement in the safety of their care during their hospital stay. The objective of this study is to establish the preliminary construct validity and internal consistency of WeCares.

methodsWeCares was distributed to patients and families. With the survey responses, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed to identify the factorial structure of WeCares. The internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Descriptive and comparative analysis was also performed to summarize patients' and families' responses.

resultsA total of 247 patients and families responded to the WeCare survey, of which 224 were used for EFA. EFA resulted in a 13-item, four-factor structure, including (1) comfortable sharing concerns, (2) responsibility for preventing errors, (3) perception of care team members' attitude, and (4) patients'/families' role in preventing errors. The Cronbach alphas were 0.716-0.866, indicating acceptable internal consistency. Overall, patients and families were comfortable sharing concerns with clinicians but preferred to remain anonymous. They believed that the care team members hold most responsibility for error prevention, however, and agreed on their ability to help prevent errors.

conclusionWeCares was developed to assess patients' and families' willingness to engage. WeCares can also be used to facilitate conversation about safety concerns and shared responsibility. The study team believes this would lead to patient activation in guarding their own care and ultimately improve patient outcomes and safety.

Indexed as

FamilyPatientsCommunicationFactor Analysis, StatisticalHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID32883579
PMCPMC9472245
OpenAlexW3044617280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.