ArticleHereditas2020
A seven-gene signature model predicts overall survival in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma.
Article in Hereditas, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of Paraptosis-Related Renal Cell Carcinoma Subtypes, Construction of a Prognostic Signature, and Determination of Tumor Microenvironment Landscape Using Bioinformatic Analysis and Experimental Verification.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- Tracing the molecular landscape of diabetic nephropathy: Insights from machine learning and experiment verification.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2025Article
- Comprehensive Analysis of Prognostic Alternative Splicing Signatures in Tumor Immune Infiltration in Bladder Cancer.Recent patents on anti-cancer drug discovery · 2025Article
- A novel brown adipocytes-related gene signature predicts and validates prognosis and immune infiltration of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.American journal of cancer research · 2024Article
- Genes associated with inflammation for prognosis prediction for clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a multi-database analysis.Translational cancer research · 2023Article
- Current Landscape of Genomic Biomarkers in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.European urology · 2023Review
- Exploring prognostic value and regulation network of PPP1R1A in hepatocellular carcinoma.Human cell · 2022Article
- Article
- Identification of epigenetic dysregulation gene markers and immune landscape in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma by comprehensive genomic analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Tubulin Isotypes: Emerging Roles in Defining Cancer Stem Cell Niche.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Telomere-related gene risk model for prognosis and drug treatment efficiency prediction in kidney cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Knockdown of ubiquitin-like modifier-activating enzyme 2 promotes apoptosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma cells.Cell death & disease · 2021Article
- Bioinformatics analysis reveals biomarkers with cancer stem cell characteristics in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma.Translational andrology and urology · 2021Article
- Article
- Construction and Validation of a Prognostic Gene-Based Model for Overall Survival Prediction in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using an Integrated Statistical and Bioinformatic Approach.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- A Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Oxidative Stress Pathway-Based Prognostic Signature for Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2021Article
- Construction of a Novel Multigene Panel Potently Predicting Poor Prognosis in Patients with Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.Cancers · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundKidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC) is a potentially fatal urogenital disease. It is a major cause of renal cell carcinoma and is often associated with late diagnosis and poor treatment outcomes. More evidence is emerging that genetic models can be used to predict the prognosis of KIRC. This study aimed to develop a model for predicting the overall survival of KIRC patients.
resultsWe identified 333 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between KIRC and normal tissues from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. We randomly divided 591 cases from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) into training and internal testing sets. In the training set, we used univariate Cox regression analysis to retrieve the survival-related DEGs and futher used multivariate Cox regression with the LASSO penalty to identify potential prognostic genes. A seven-gene signature was identified that included APOLD1, C9orf66, G6PC, PPP1R1A, CNN1G, TIMP1, and TUBB2B. The seven-gene signature was evaluated in the training set, internal testing set, and external validation using data from the ICGC database. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the high risk group had a significantly shorter overall survival time than the low risk group in the training, testing, and ICGC datasets. ROC analysis showed that the model had a high performance with an AUC of 0.738 in the training set, 0.706 in the internal testing set, and 0.656 in the ICGC external validation set.
conclusionOur findings show that a seven-gene signature can serve as an independent biomarker for predicting prognosis in KIRC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.