Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32883294›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2020

Worldwide surveillance of self-reported sitting time: a scoping review.

M Mclaughlin, A J Atkin, L Starr, A Hall, L Wolfenden, R Sutherland, J Wiggers, A Ramirez, P Hallal, M Pratt and 3 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Defaults at Work: A Field Experiment on the Effect of Nudges on Stand-Up Working.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

M MclaughlinSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, 2308, Australia. Matthew.Mclaughlin1@health.nsw.gov.au.ORCID 0000-0003-2870-8556
A J AtkinFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3819-3448
L StarrWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3259-9647
A HallHunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, 2300, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1043-6110
L WolfendenSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, 2308, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6178-3868
R SutherlandSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, 2308, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0470-7663
J WiggersSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, 2308, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6361-9685
A RamirezSchool of Medicine, Los Andes University, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-2685-9617
P HallalSchool of Medicine, Los Andes University, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-1470-6461
M PrattUniversity of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
B M LynchCancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8060-547X
K WijndaeleMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2199-7981
Sedentary Behaviour Council Global Monitoring Initiative Working Group

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00006/4Medical Research Council MC_UU_12015/3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProlonged sitting time is a risk factor for chronic disease, yet recent global surveillance is not well described. The aims were to clarify: (i) the countries that have collected country-level data on self-reported sitting time; (ii) the single-item tools used to collect these data; and (iii) the duration of sitting time reported across low- to high-income countries.

methodsCountry-level data collected within the last 10 years using single-item self-report were included. The six-stage methodology: (1) reviewing Global Observatory for Physical Activity! Country Cards; (2-4) country-specific searches of PubMed, the Demographic and Health Survey website and Google; (5) analysing the Eurobarometer 88.4; and (6) country-specific searches for World Health Organization STEPwise reports.

resultsA total of 7641 records were identified and screened for eligibility. Sixty-two countries (29%) reported sitting time representing 47% of the global adult population. The majority of data were from high-income (61%) and middle income (29%) countries. The tools used were the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ; n = 34), a modified IPAQ (n = 1) or the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ; n = 27). The median of mean daily sitting times was 4.7 (IQR: 3.5-5.1) hours across all countries. Higher-income countries recorded a longer duration of sitting time than lower-income countries (4.9 vs 2.7 h).

conclusionsThis study provides an updated collation of countries collecting self-reported sitting time data. The daily sitting time findings should be interpreted cautiously. Current surveillance of sitting time is limited by a lack of coverage. Measures of population sitting time that are valid, feasible and sensitive to change should be embedded within global surveillance systems, to help guide future policy, research and practice.

trial registrationNot applicable.

Indexed as

ExerciseGlobal HealthSedentary BehaviorSitting PositionFemaleHumansIncomeMalePovertySelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsSedentary behaviourSitting timeSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID32883294
PMCPMC7469304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.