Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32883202›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2020

Insights into the resistance of a synthetically-derived wheat to Septoria tritici blotch disease: less is more.

Harriet R Benbow, Ciarán J Brennan, Binbin Zhou, Thalia Christodoulou, Simon Berry, Cristobal Uauy, Ewen Mullins, Fiona M Doohan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Harriet R BenbowUCD School of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin, UCD Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Ciarán J BrennanUCD School of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin, UCD Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Binbin ZhouUCD School of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin, UCD Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Thalia ChristodoulouUCD School of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin, UCD Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Simon BerryLimagrain UK Ltd, Windmill Avenue, Woolpit, Suffolk, IP30 9UP, UK.
Cristobal UauyJohn Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
Ewen MullinsTeagasc Crops Research, Oak Park, Co. Carlow, Ireland.
Fiona M DoohanUCD School of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin, UCD Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. Fiona.doohan@ucd.ie.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about the initial, symptomless (latent) phase of the devastating wheat disease Septoria tritici blotch. However, speculations as to its impact on fungal success and disease severity in the field have suggested that a long latent phase is beneficial to the host and can reduce inoculum build up in the field over a growing season. The winter wheat cultivar Stigg is derived from a synthetic hexaploid wheat and contains introgressions from wild tetraploid wheat Triticum turgidum subsp. dicoccoides, which contribute to cv. Stigg's exceptional STB resistance, hallmarked by a long latent phase. We compared the early transcriptomic response to Zymoseptoria tritici of cv. Stigg to a susceptible wheat cultivar, to elucidate the mechanisms of and differences in pathogen recognition and disease response in these two hosts.

resultsThe STB-susceptible cultivar Longbow responds to Z. tritici infection with a stress response, including activation of hormone-responsive transcription factors, post translational modifications, and response to oxidative stress. The activation of key genes associated with these pathways in cv. Longbow was independently observed in a second susceptible wheat cultivar based on an independent gene expression study. By comparison, cv. Stigg is apathetic in response to STB, and appears to fail to activate a range of defence pathways that cv. Longbow employs. Stigg also displays some evidence of sub-genome bias in its response to Z. tritici infection, whereas the susceptible cv. Longbow shows even distribution of Z. tritici responsive genes across the three wheat sub-genomes.

conclusionsWe identify a suite of disease response genes that are involved in early pathogen response in susceptible wheat cultivars that may ultimately lead to susceptibility. In comparison, we hypothesise that rather than an active defence response to stave off disease progression, cv. Stigg's defence strategy is molecular lethargy, or a lower-amplitude of pathogen recognition that may stem from cv. Stigg's wild wheat-derived ancestry. Overall, we present insights into cv. Stigg's exceptional resistance to STB, and present key biological processes for further characterisation in this pathosystem.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeAscomycotaDisease ResistancePlant DiseasesTriticumLatent phase4septoria2transcriptomics3wheat1Zymoseptoria tritici5

Identifiers

PMID32883202
PMCPMC7469286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.