ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2020
Quantification of myocardial strain in patients with isolated left ventricular non-compaction and healthy subjects using deformable registration algorithm: comparison with feature tracking.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging predictors of outcomes in noncompaction cardiomyopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Review
- Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in repaired tetralogy of Fallot: A longitudinal midterm follow-up study.PloS one · 2024Article
- Myocardial Mechanics and Associated Valvular and Vascular Abnormalities in Left Ventricular Noncompaction Cardiomyopathy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Value of cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking technology in the differential diagnosis of isolated left ventricular noncompaction and dilated cardiomyopathy.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Comparison of left ventricular global and segmental strain parameters by cardiovascular magnetic resonance tissue tracking in light-chain cardiac amyloidosis and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSystolic dysfunction of the left ventricle is frequently associated with isolated left ventricular non-compaction (iLVNC). Clinically, the ejection fraction (EF) is the primary index of cardiac function. However, changes of EF usually occur later in the disease course. Feature tracking (FT) and deformable registration algorithm (DRA) have become appealing techniques for myocardial strain assessment.
methodsThirty patients with iLVNC (36.7 ± 13.3 years old) and fifty healthy volunteers (42.3 ± 13.6 years old) underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) examination on a 1.5 T MR scanner. Strain values in the radial, circumferential, longitudinal directions were analyzed based on the short-axis and long-axis cine images using FT and DRA methods. The iLVNC patients were further divided based on the ejection fraction, into EF ≥ 50% group (n = 11) and EF < 50% group (n = 19). Receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic performance of the global strain values. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis was used to evaluate the intra- and inter-observer agreement.
resultsGlobal radial strain (GRS) was statistically lower in EF ≥ 50% group compared with control group [GRS (DRA)/% vs. controls: 34.6 ± 7.0 vs. 37.6 ± 7.2, P < 0.001; GRS (FT)/% vs. controls: 37.4 ± 13.2 vs. 56.9 ± 16.4, P < 0.01]. ROC analysis of global strain values derived from DRA and FT demonstrated high area under curve (range, 0.743-0.854). DRA showed excellent intra- and inter-observer agreement of global strain in both iLVNC patients (ICC: 0.995-0.999) and normal controls (ICC: 0.934-0.996). While for FT analysis, global radial strain of normal controls showed moderate intra-observer (ICC: 0.509) and poor inter-observer agreement (ICC: 0.394).
conclusionsIn patients with iLVNC, DRA can be used to quantitatively analyze the strain of left ventricle, with global radial strain being an earlier marker of LV systolic dysfunction. DRA has better reproducibility in evaluating both the global and segmental strain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.