Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32883033›Full record

ReviewNutrients2020

Animal, Plant, Collagen and Blended Dietary Proteins: Effects on Musculoskeletal Outcomes.

Colleen S Deane, Joseph J Bass, Hannah Crossland, Bethan E Phillips, Philip J Atherton

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Association between total and animal proteins with risk of fracture: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of cohort studies.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Colleen S DeaneDepartment of Sport and Health Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University ofExeter, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK.
Joseph J BassMRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research and NIHR Nottingham BiomedicalResearch Centre, University of Nottingham, Royal Derby Hospital Centre, Derby DE22 3DT, UK.
Hannah CrosslandMRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research and NIHR Nottingham BiomedicalResearch Centre, University of Nottingham, Royal Derby Hospital Centre, Derby DE22 3DT, UK.
Bethan E PhillipsMRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research and NIHR Nottingham BiomedicalResearch Centre, University of Nottingham, Royal Derby Hospital Centre, Derby DE22 3DT, UK.
Philip J AthertonMRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research and NIHR Nottingham BiomedicalResearch Centre, University of Nottingham, Royal Derby Hospital Centre, Derby DE22 3DT, UK.
Versus Arthritis · GBNottingham Biomedical Research Centre · GBUniversity of Exeter · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P021220/1Medical Research Council MR/T026014/1MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research MR/P021220/1 and MR/R502364/1National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dietary protein is critical for the maintenance of musculoskeletal health, whereappropriate intake (i.e., source, dose, timing) can mitigate declines in muscle and bone mass and/orfunction. Animal-derived protein is a potent anabolic source due to rapid digestion and absorptionkinetics stimulating robust increases in muscle protein synthesis and promoting bone accretion andmaintenance. However, global concerns surrounding environmental sustainability has led to anincreasing interest in plant- and collagen-derived protein as alternative or adjunct dietary sources.This is despite the lower anabolic profile of plant and collagen protein due to the inferior essentialamino acid profile (e.g., lower leucine content) and subordinate digestibility (versus animal). Thisreview evaluates the efficacy of animal-, plant- and collagen-derived proteins in isolation, and asprotein blends, for augmenting muscle and bone metabolism and health in the context of ageing,exercise and energy restriction.

Indexed as

AgingAnimal Proteins, DietaryAnimalsBone and BonesBone RemodelingCaloric RestrictionCollagenDietary ProteinsExerciseHumansMuscle, SkeletalNutritional Physiological PhenomenaPlant Proteins, DietaryProtein BiosynthesisAnimal Proteins, DietaryCollagenDietary ProteinsPlant Proteins, Dietaryageinganimal-derived proteinbonecollagen-derived proteinenergy restrictionexerciseplant-derived proteinprotein blendsskeletal muscle

Identifiers

PMID32883033
PMCPMC7551889
OpenAlexW3082875662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.