Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32883006›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Detection of Focal and Non-Focal Electroencephalogram Signals Using Fast Walsh-Hadamard Transform and Artificial Neural Network.

Prasanna J, M S P Subathra, Mazin Abed Mohammed, Mashael S Maashi, Begonya Garcia-Zapirain, N J Sairamya, S Thomas George

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Efficient novel network and index for alcoholism detection from EEGs.Health information science and systems · 2023
    Article
  5. RADIC:A tool for diagnosing COVID-19 from chest CT and X-ray scans using deep learning and quad-radiomics.Chemometrics and intelligent laboratory systems : an international journal sponsored by the Chemometrics Society · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Acquisition and Processing of Brain Signals.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Prasanna JDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Tamil Nadu 641114, India.
M S P SubathraDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Tamil Nadu 641114, India.
Mazin Abed MohammedCollege of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Anbar, 11, Ramadi, Anbar, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0001-9030-8102
Mashael S MaashiSoftware Engineering Department, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-0446-5430
Begonya Garcia-ZapirainEvida Lab, University of Deusto, Avda/Univesidades 24, 48007 Bilbao, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9356-1186
N J SairamyaDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Tamil Nadu 641114, India.
S Thomas GeorgeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Tamil Nadu 641114, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0304-495X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discrimination of non-focal class (NFC) and focal class (FC), is vital in localizing the epileptogenic zone (EZ) during neurosurgery. In the conventional diagnosis method, the neurologist has to visually examine the long hour electroencephalogram (EEG) signals, which consumes time and is prone to error. Hence, in this present work, automated diagnosis of FC EEG signals from NFC EEG signals is developed using the Fast Walsh-Hadamard Transform (FWHT) method, entropies, and artificial neural network (ANN). The FWHT analyzes the EEG signals in the frequency domain and decomposes it into the Hadamard coefficients. Five different nonlinear features, namely approximate entropy (ApEn), log-energy entropy (LogEn), fuzzy entropy (FuzzyEn), sample entropy (SampEn), and permutation entropy (PermEn) are extracted from the decomposed Hadamard coefficients. The extracted features detail the nonlinearity in the NFC and the FC EEG signals. The judicious entropy features are supplied to the ANN classifier, with a 10-fold cross-validation method to classify the NFC and FC classes. Two publicly available datasets such as the University of Bonn and Bern-Barcelona dataset are used to evaluate the proposed approach. A maximum sensitivity of 99.70%, the accuracy of 99.50%, and specificity of 99.30% with the 3750 pairs of NFC and FC signal are achieved using the Bern-Barcelona dataset, while the accuracy of 92.80%, the sensitivity of 91%, and specificity of 94.60% is achieved using University of Bonn dataset. Compared to the existing technique, the proposed approach attained a maximum classification performance in both the dataset.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographySignal Processing, Computer-AssistedEntropyNeural Networks, ComputerNeurosurgical Proceduresartificial neural networkclassificationentropyfast Walsh–Hadamard transformfeature extraction

Identifiers

PMID32883006
PMCPMC7506968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.