Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32883000›Full record

ReviewCancers2020

Entosis: From Cell Biology to Clinical Cancer Pathology.

Izabela Mlynarczuk-Bialy, Ireneusz Dziuba, Agnieszka Sarnecka, Emilia Platos, Magdalena Kowalczyk, Katarzyna K Pels, Grzegorz M Wilczynski, Cezary Wojcik, Lukasz P Bialy

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Programmed cell death in human respiratory syncytial virus infection.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Izabela Mlynarczuk-BialyDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-004 Warszawa, Poland.
Ireneusz DziubaDepartment of Pathology, West Pomeranian Hospital in Gryfice, 72-300 Gryfice, Poland.
Agnieszka SarneckaHESA Association at the Department of Histology and Embryology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-004 Warszawa, Poland.
Emilia PlatosHESA Association at the Department of Histology and Embryology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-004 Warszawa, Poland.
Magdalena KowalczykHESA Association at the Department of Histology and Embryology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-004 Warszawa, Poland.
Katarzyna K PelsNencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland.
Grzegorz M WilczynskiNencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland.
Cezary WojcikUS Cardiovascular, Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320-1799, USA.
Lukasz P BialyDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-004 Warszawa, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6931-6431
Medical University of Warsaw · PLInstytut Biologii Doświadczalnej im. Marcelego Nenckiego · PLAmgen (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Entosis is a phenomenon, in which one cell enters a second one. New clinico-histopathological studies of entosis prompted us to summarize its significance in cancer. It appears that entosis might be a novel, independent prognostic predictor factor in cancer histopathology. We briefly discuss the biological basis of entosis, followed by a summary of published clinico-histopathological studies on entosis significance in cancer prognosis. The correlation of entosis with cancer prognosis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, anal carcinoma, lung adenocarcinoma, pancreatic ductal carcinoma and breast ductal carcinoma, is shown. Numerous entotic figures are associated with a more malignant cancer phenotype and poor prognosis in many cancers. We also showed that some anticancer drugs could induce entosis in cell culture, even as an escape mechanism. Thus, entosis is likely beneficial for survival of malignant cells, i.e., an entotic cell can hide from unfavourable factors in another cell and subsequently leave the host cell remaining intact, leading to failure in therapy or cancer recurrence. Finally, we highlight the potential relationship of cell adhesion with entosis in vitro, based on the model of the BxPc3 cells cultured in full adhesive conditions, comparing them to a commonly used MCF7 semiadhesive model of entosis.

Indexed as

cancercancer predictor factorcancer prognosiscell adhesioncell-in-cellcell internalisationentosis

Identifiers

PMID32883000
PMCPMC7563411
OpenAlexW3082983208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.