Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32882998›Full record

ArticleViruses2020

Development and Validation of a Rapid Lateral Flow E1/E2-Antigen Test and ELISA in Patients Infected with Emerging Asian Strain of Chikungunya Virus in the Americas.

Ankita Reddy, Irene Bosch, Nol Salcedo, Bobby Brooke Herrera, Helena de Puig, Carlos F Narváez, Diana María Caicedo-Borrero, Ivette Lorenzana, Leda Parham, Kimberly García and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2: The gradual boom of lateral flow immunoassay.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Ankita ReddyE25Bio, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4986-8719
Irene BoschE25Bio, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Nol SalcedoE25Bio, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4232-3268
Bobby Brooke HerreraE25Bio, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2438-6716
Helena de PuigInstitute for Medical Engineering & Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Carlos F NarváezPrograma de Medicina, Facultad de Salud, Universidad Surcolombiana, Neiva, Huila, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-0129-5210
Diana María Caicedo-BorreroDepartamento de Salud Pública y Epidemiología de la Pontificia Universidad, Javeriana Cali y Escuela de Salud Pública de la Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.
Ivette LorenzanaInstituto de Investigación en Microbiología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.
Leda ParhamInstituto de Investigación en Microbiología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.
Kimberly GarcíaInstituto de Investigación en Microbiología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.ORCID 0000-0003-4230-6684
Marcela MercadoDirección de Investigación en Salud Pública, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Bogotá, Colombia.
Angélica María Rico TurcaLaboratorio de Virología, Dirección de Redes en Salud Pública, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Bogotá, Colombia.
Luis A Villar-CentenoDepartments of Escuela de Medicina, Universidad Industrial de Santander and AEDES Network, Bucaramanga, Santander, Colombia.
Margarita Gélvez-RamírezDepartments of Escuela de Medicina, Universidad Industrial de Santander and AEDES Network, Bucaramanga, Santander, Colombia.
Natalia Andrea Gómez RíosDepartments of Escuela de Medicina, Universidad Industrial de Santander and AEDES Network, Bucaramanga, Santander, Colombia.
Megan HileyInstitute for Medical Engineering & Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Dawlyn GarcíaInstitute for Medical Engineering & Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Michael S DiamondDepartments of Medicine, Molecular Microbiology, Pathology & Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Lee GehrkeE25Bio, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9387-8212
Harvard University · USIndustrial University of Santander · COMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USNational Autonomous University of Honduras · HNInstituto Nacional de Salud · COPontificia Universidad Javeriana · COUniversidad Surcolombiana · COUniversity of Pennsylvania · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

INFECTIOUS DISEASE AND BASIC MICROBIOLOGICAL MECHANISMST32AI007061 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Marcia B Goldberg · 1985 to 2026
$12.1M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since its 2013 emergence in the Americas, Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) has posed a serious threat to public health. Early and accurate diagnosis of the disease, though currently lacking in clinics, is integral to enable timely care and epidemiological response. We developed a dual detection system: a CHIKV antigen E1/E2-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and a lateral flow test using high-affinity anti-CHIKV antibodies. The ELISA was validated with 100 PCR-tested acute Chikungunya fever samples from Honduras. The assay had an overall sensitivity and specificity of 51% and 96.67%, respectively, with accuracy reaching 95.45% sensitivity and 92.03% specificity at a cycle threshold (Ct) cutoff of 22. As the Ct value decreased from 35 to 22, the ELISA sensitivity increased. We then developed and validated two lateral flow tests using independent antibody pairs. The sensitivity and specificity reached 100% for both lateral flow tests using 39 samples from Colombia and Honduras at Ct cutoffs of 20 and 27, respectively. For both lateral flow tests, sensitivity decreased as the Ct increased after 27. Because CHIKV E1/E2 are exposed in the virion surfaces in serum during the acute infection phase, these sensitive and specific assays demonstrate opportunities for early detection of this emerging human pathogen.

Indexed as

Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayImmunoassayAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralChikungunya FeverChikungunya virusColombiaHondurasHumansSensitivity and SpecificitySerologic TestsViral Envelope ProteinsAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralViral Envelope Proteinsacute phase diagnosisalphavirusChikungunya feverE1/E2 antigen detectionELISAlateral flowLatin Americarapid diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID32882998
PMCPMC7552019
OpenAlexW3048970367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.