Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32882924›Full record

ReviewBiosensors2020

Biosensors for Antioxidants Detection: Trends and Perspectives.

Melinda David, Monica Florescu, Camelia Bala

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biosensors, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Melinda DavidDepartment of Fundamental, Prophylactic and Clinical Disciplines, Faculty of Medicine, Transilvania University of Brasov, Str. Universitatii no. 1, 500068 Brasov, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-2971-4547
Monica FlorescuDepartment of Fundamental, Prophylactic and Clinical Disciplines, Faculty of Medicine, Transilvania University of Brasov, Str. Universitatii no. 1, 500068 Brasov, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-1467-3113
Camelia BalaLaboratory for Quality Control and Process Monitoring, University of Bucharest, 4-12 Elisabeta Blvd., 030018 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-9481-3496
Transylvania University of Brașov · ROUniversity of Bucharest · RO

Funding

Romanian Ministry of Research and Innovation, UEFISCDI PN-III-P1-1.2-PCCDI-2017-0062, PN-III-P1-1.1-PD-2019-1285
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Herein we review the recent advances in biosensors for antioxidants detection underlying principles particularly emphasizing advantages along with limitations regarding the ability to discriminate between the specific antioxidant or total content. Recent advances in both direct detection of antioxidants, but also on indirect detection, measuring the induced damage on DNA-based biosensors are critically analysed. Additionally, latest developments on (bio)electronic tongues are also presented.

Indexed as

AntioxidantsBiosensing TechniquesDNANanostructuresAntioxidantsDNAantioxidantsbiosensornanomaterials

Identifiers

PMID32882924
PMCPMC7560058
OpenAlexW3082746313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.