Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32882883›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Fast-Versus Slow-Resorbable Calcium Phosphate Bone Substitute Materials-Texture Analysis after 12 Months of Observation.

Tomasz Wach, Marcin Kozakiewicz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Measures of Corticalization.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tomasz WachDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical University in Lodz, Pl. Hallera 1, 90-647 Łódź, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4763-8354
Marcin KozakiewiczDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical University in Lodz, Pl. Hallera 1, 90-647 Łódź, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9200-2828

Funding

Uniwersytet Medyczny w Lodzi 503-51-001-17Uniwersytet Medyczny w Lodzi 503-51-001-18Uniwersytet Medyczny w Lodzi 503-51-001-19-00Uniwersytet Medyczny w Lodzi 503-51-002-18
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of oral surgery and implantology has led to the need for better and more predictable materials. Various substitute materials are now used for bone regeneration. The replacement of scaffolding material by new bone tissue is the most important condition. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the resorbability of bone substitute materials during regeneration to the jawbone. The study included 88 patients during the 12-month follow-up. All the patients had undergone oral surgical procedures using two different substitute materials-Cerasorb (high-rate resorbable (β-tricalcium phosphate)) and Endobone (low-rate resorbable (hydroxyapatite)). Texture analysis was performed in intraoral radiographs, in which regions of interest were established for the bone substitute materials and reference bone. Five texture features were calculated, namely the sum average (SumAverg), entropy (Entropy), and three Harr discrete wavelet transform coefficients. This study revealed that all 5 features described the healing process well. Entropy was decreased in both cases with time; however, in Cerasorb cases, the texture feature values were very close to those of the reference bone after 12 months of healing (

Indexed as

alveolar crestaugmentationbone substitute materialintraoral radiographtexture analysis

Identifiers

PMID32882883
PMCPMC7503390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.