Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32882250›Full record

Observational studyChest2021

Angiotensin II Infusion for Shock: A Multicenter Study of Postmarketing Use.

Patrick M Wieruszewski, Erica D Wittwer, Kianoush B Kashani, Daniel R Brown, Simona O Butler, Angela M Clark, Craig J Cooper, Danielle L Davison, Ognjen Gajic, Kyle J Gunnerson and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Chest, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06539234 (Angiotensin II Stress Test. Renin Kinetics During Treatment of Vasoplegic Shock With Angiotensin II in Relation to Hemodynamic Response to Treatment With Angiotensin II.), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06539234 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Angiotensin II Stress Test. Renin Kinetics During Treatment of Vasoplegic Shock With Angiotensin II in Relation to Hemodynamic Response to Treatment With Angiotensin II.

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Medical Centre MariborRan2024 to 2026Enrolled80ConditionsShock, Vasoplegic Syndrome
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Continuous Hemodynamic Response to Angiotensin II in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients: A Single Center Cohort Study.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2025
    Article
  7. Vasoactive Agents in Burn Patients: Perspectives on Angiotensin-II.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. [Vasoactive agents in septic shock-individualized strategies].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Angiotensin II-Real-Life Use and Literature Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Adoption of a Novel Vasopressor Agent in Critically Ill Adults.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Patrick M WieruszewskiDepartment of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Multidisciplinary Epidemiology and Translational Research in Intensive Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Erica D WittwerMultidisciplinary Epidemiology and Translational Research in Intensive Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Kianoush B KashaniMultidisciplinary Epidemiology and Translational Research in Intensive Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Daniel R BrownMultidisciplinary Epidemiology and Translational Research in Intensive Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Simona O ButlerDepartment of Pharmacy, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI.
Angela M ClarkDepartment of Pharmacy, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI.
Craig J CooperDepartment of Pharmacy, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL.
Danielle L DavisonDepartments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
Ognjen GajicMultidisciplinary Epidemiology and Translational Research in Intensive Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Kyle J GunnersonDepartments of Emergency Medicine, Anesthesiology, and Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI.
Rachel TendlerDepartment of Pharmacy, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Kristin C MaraDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Erin F BarretoDepartment of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Multidisciplinary Epidemiology and Translational Research in Intensive Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. Electronic address: barreto.erin@mayo.edu.

Funding

Mayo Clinic Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCaTS UL1 Supplement - Dr. Timothy Curry)UL1TR002377 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI VESNA D GAROVIC · 2017 to 2026
$78.4M
Beta-lactam individualization for critically ill patientsK23AI143882 · NIAID · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI BARRETO, ERIN FRAZEE · 2020 to 2024
$986k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002377NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI143882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVasodilatory shock refractory to catecholamine vasopressors and arginine vasopressin is highly morbid and responsible for significant mortality. Synthetic angiotensin II is a potent vasoconstrictor that may be suitable for use in these patients. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the safety and effectiveness of angiotensin II and what variables are associated with a favorable hemodynamic response? STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsWe performed a multicenter, retrospective study at five tertiary medical centers in the United States. The primary end point of hemodynamic responsiveness to angiotensin II was defined as attainment of mean arterial pressure (MAP) of ≥ 65 mm Hg with a stable or reduced total vasopressor dosage 3 h after drug initiation.

resultsOf 270 included patients, 181 (67%) demonstrated hemodynamic responsiveness to angiotensin II. Responders showed a greater increase in MAP (+10.3 mm Hg vs +1.6 mm Hg, P < .001) and reduction in vasopressor dosage (-0.20 μg/kg/min vs +0.04 μg/kg/min; P < .001) compared with nonresponders at 3 h. Variables associated with favorable hemodynamic response included lower lactate concentration (OR 1.11; 95% CI, 1.05-1.17, P < .001) and receipt of vasopressin (OR, 6.05; 95% CI, 1.98-18.6; P = .002). In severity-adjusted multivariate analysis, hemodynamic responsiveness to angiotensin II was associated with reduced likelihood of 30-day mortality (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.35-0.71; P < .001). Arrhythmias occurred in 28 patients (10%) and VTE was identified in 4 patients.

interpretationIn postmarketing use for vasopressor-refractory shock, 67% of angiotensin II recipients demonstrated a favorable hemodynamic response. Patients with lower lactate concentrations and those receiving vasopressin were more likely to respond to angiotensin II. Patients who responded to angiotensin II experienced reduced mortality.

Indexed as

Product Surveillance, PostmarketingAngiotensin IIFemaleHemodynamicsHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesShockUnited StatesVasoconstrictor AgentsAngiotensin IIVasoconstrictor Agentscritical carehypotensionrefractory shockvasodilatory shockvasopressors

Identifiers

PMID32882250
PMCPMC7856533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.