Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32882193›Full record

ReviewThe Annals of thoracic surgery2021

When to Consider Deferral of Surgery in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Review.

Ashraf A Sabe, Edward D Percy, Tsuyoshi Kaneko, Ryan P Plichta, G Chad Hughes

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Noteworthy Literature of 2020: COVID Effects in Cardiac Surgery.Seminars in cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia · 2021
    Review
  18. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ashraf A SabeDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: asabe@partners.org.
Edward D PercyDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Tsuyoshi KanekoDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ryan P PlichtaDivision of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
G Chad HughesDivision of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Duke Medical Center · USHarvard University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is a surgical emergency with an operative mortality of up to 30%, a rate that has not changed meaningfully in more than 2 decades. A growing body of research has highlighted several comorbidities and presenting factors in which delay or permanent deferral of surgery may be considered; however, modern comprehensive summative reviews are lacking. The urgency and timing of this review are underscored by significant challenges in resource use posed by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This review provides an update on the current understanding of risk assessment, surgical candidacy, and operative timing in patients with ATAAD.

methodsA literature search was conducted through PubMed and Embase databases to identify relevant studies relating to risk assessment in ATAAD. Articles were selected by group consensus on the basis of quality and relevance.

resultsSeveral patient factors have been identified that increase risk in ATAAD repair. In particular, frailty, advanced age, previous cardiac surgery, and use of novel anticoagulant medications have been studied. The understanding of malperfusion syndromes has also expanded significantly, including recommendations for surgical delay. Finally, approaches to triage have been significantly influenced by resource limitations related to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Although medical management remains a reasonable option in carefully selected patients at prohibitive risk for open surgery, endovascular therapies for treatment of ATAAD are rapidly evolving.

conclusionsEarly surgical repair remains the preferred treatment for most patients with ATAAD. However, improvements in risk stratification should guide appropriate delay or permanent deferral of surgery in select individuals.

Indexed as

Time-to-TreatmentAcute DiseaseAlgorithmsAortic Aneurysm, ThoracicAortic DissectionCOVID-19HumansPractice Guidelines as TopicVascular Surgical Procedures

Identifiers

PMID32882193
PMCPMC7457910
OpenAlexW3082862476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.