Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32882101›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2020

Clinical benefits and safety of renal denervation in severe arterial hypertension: A long-term follow-up study.

Tino Naduvathumuriyil, Ulrike Held, Klaus Steigmiller, Andrea Denegri, Silviya Cantatore, Slayman Obeid, Andreas J Flammer, Frank Ruschitzka, Thomas F Lüscher, Isabella Sudano

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Tino NaduvathumuriyilDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4909-1930
Ulrike HeldEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Klaus SteigmillerEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Andrea DenegriDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5095-1523
Silviya CantatoreDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Slayman ObeidDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Andreas J FlammerDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Frank RuschitzkaDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Thomas F LüscherDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Isabella SudanoDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8197-8892
University Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of Zurich · CHUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical benefits of renal denervation are still under discussion, since randomized controlled clinical studies have provided inconsistent results. The present retrospective study examined the clinical effects of renal denervation with focus on office blood pressure, heart rate, and changes in renal function. Patients with treatment-resistant hypertension (blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mm Hg in spite of 3 antihypertensive drugs including a diuretic) underwent renal denervation at the University Hospital of Zurich, Switzerland and were followed up until 36 months. Renal denervation was performed using 3 different renal denervation systems. The primary outcome consisted of change in office blood pressure, heart rate, and plasma creatinine at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after renal denervation. 58 patients underwent renal denervation between August 2010 and December 2017. After exclusion, 50 patients were included in the analyses. At 36 months, the mean office systolic and diastolic blood pressure change was -26.4/-8.8 mm Hg (95% CI: -34.6 to -18.2/-13.5 to -4.2 mm Hg; P < .001 for both). Office heart rate showed no significant change during follow-up (P = .361). Plasma creatinine increased from 90.6 µmol/L (95% CI: 82.1 to 99.0 µmol/L) at baseline to 102.1 µmol/L (95% CI: 95.8 to 108.3 µmol/L) at 36 months (P = .007). No major adverse events occurred. Renal denervation is a safe and effective procedure for patients with treatment-resistant hypertension with a clinically significant antihypertensive effect. Further randomized trials are needed to determine the specific context within which renal denervation should be considered a therapeutic option in antihypertensive care.

Indexed as

DenervationHypertensionAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureFollow-Up StudiesHumansKidneyRenal ArteryRetrospective StudiesSwitzerlandTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive Agentsblood pressurehypertensionrenal denervationresistant hypertension

Identifiers

PMID32882101
PMCPMC8029726
OpenAlexW3083268900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.