Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32881778›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational and environmental medicine2020

Vaping in the Workplace: Implications for Employer-Sponsored Tobacco Cessation Programs.

Amanda L Graham, Michael S Amato, Megan A Jacobs, Alexa R Romberg, Megan C Diaz, Basmah Rahman, Barbara A Schillo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amanda L GrahamInnovations Center (Dr Graham, Dr Amato, Ms Jacobs), Truth Initiative, Washington, DC; Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota (Dr Graham, Dr Amato); Schroeder Institute (Dr Romberg, Dr Diaz, Ms Rahman, Dr Schillo), Truth Initiative, Washington, DC; and College of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York (Dr Romberg).
Michael S Amato
Megan A Jacobs
Alexa R Romberg
Megan C Diaz
Basmah Rahman
Barbara A Schillo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAssess workplace vaping as a trigger for tobacco use; examine interest in and prevalence of vaping cessation programs; determine needs of parents whose children vape.

methodsEmployees of companies with more than 150 employees, drawn from an opt-in national online panel (N = 1607), ages 18 to 65, completed an online survey in November 2019.

resultsAmong tobacco users, 46% to 48% reported workplace vaping was a trigger for smoking and vaping, respectively; 7% of former users reported it as a trigger. Quit vaping support is important to 85% of employees; 1/3 of workplaces have such programs, with industry variation. Child vaping results in presenteeism and absenteeism among roughly 1/3 of parents.

conclusionsWorkplace vaping is a trigger for smoking and vaping among current and former tobacco users. A gap exists between desired support for vaping cessation and current employer-sponsored cessation programs.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsSmoking CessationTobacco Use CessationVapingAdolescentAdultAgedChildHumansMiddle AgedSmokingWorkplaceYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32881778
PMCPMC7720875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.