Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32881421›Full record

ReviewCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2022

HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastasis: A new and exciting landscape.

Alexandra S Zimmer, Amanda E D Van Swearingen, Carey K Anders

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Molecular biomedicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Is the risk of brain metastasis and prognosis different in HER2-low breast cancer?Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Association Between the Volume Transfer Constant (KCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Ki-67 correlations in breast cancer.Journal of medicine and life · 2025
    Article
  20. Review

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandra S ZimmerWomen's Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6789-0982
Amanda E D Van SwearingenDuke Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4287-9741
Carey K AndersDuke Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9165-4074
Duke Institute for Health Innovation · USNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrain metastases (BrM) incidence is 25% to 50% in women with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. Radiation and surgery are currently the main local treatment approaches for central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Systemic anti-HER2 therapy following a diagnosis of BrM improves outcomes. Previous preclinical data has helped elucidate HER2 brain trophism, the blood-brain/blood-tumor barrier(s), and the brain tumor microenvironment, all of which can lead to development of novel therapeutic options. RECENT

findingsSeveral anti-HER2 agents are currently available and reviewed here, some of which have recently shown promising effects in BrM patients, specifically. New strategies driven by and focusing on brain metastasis-specific genomics, immunotherapy, and preventive strategies have shown promising results and are under development.

conclusionsThe field of HER2+ breast cancer, particularly for BrM, continues to evolve as new therapeutic strategies show promising results in recent clinical trials. Increasing inclusion of patients with BrM in clinical studies, and a focus on assessing their outcomes both intracranially and extracranially, is changing the landscape for patients with HER2+ CNS metastases by demonstrating the ability of newer agents to improve outcomes.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansTumor Microenvironmentbrain metastasisCNS involvementHER2-positive breast cancerT-DM1trastuzumabtucatinib

Identifiers

PMID32881421
PMCPMC9124511
OpenAlexW3083176429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.