Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32881399›Full record

ArticleESC heart failure2020

Implementation of sacubitril/valsartan in Sweden: clinical characteristics, titration patterns, and determinants.

Michael Fu, Ola Vedin, Bodil Svennblad, Erik Lampa, Daniel Johansson, Ulf Dahlström, Krister Lindmark, Peter Vasko, Anna Lundberg, Madlaina Costa-Scharplatz and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESC heart failure, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Real-world comparative effectiveness of ARNI versus ACEi/ARB in HF with reduced or mildly reduced ejection fraction.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Michael FuDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ola VedinDepartment of Medical Sciences, Cardiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Bodil SvennbladUppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Erik LampaUppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Daniel JohanssonNovartis Sweden AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ulf DahlströmDepartment of Cardiology and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
Krister LindmarkHeart Centre, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Peter VaskoCentral Hospital, Växjö, Sweden.
Anna LundbergNovartis Sweden AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
Madlaina Costa-ScharplatzNovartis Sweden AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lars H LundDepartment of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

Novartis
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe aim of this study is to study the introduction of sacubitril/valsartan (sac/val) in Sweden with regards to regional differences, clinical characteristics, titration patterns, and determinants of use and discontinuation. METHODS AND

resultsA national cohort of heart failure was defined from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register and National Patient Register. A subcohort with additional data from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry (SwedeHF) was also studied. Cohorts were subdivided as per sac/val prescription and registration in SwedeHF. Median sac/val prescription rate was 20 per 100 000 inhabitants. Between April 2016 and December 2017, we identified 2037 patients with ≥1 sac/val prescription, of which 1144 (56%) were registered in SwedeHF. Overall, patients prescribed with sac/val were younger, more frequently male, and had less prior cardiovascular disease than non-sac/val patients. In SwedeHF subcohort, patients prescribed with sac/val had lower ejection fraction. Overall, younger age [hazard ratio 2.81 (95% confidence interval 2.45-3.22)], registration in SwedeHF [1.97 (1.83-2.12)], male gender [1.50 (1.37-1.64)], ischaemic heart disease [1.50 (1.39-1.62)], lower left ventricular ejection fraction [3.06 (2.18-4.31)], and New York Heart Association IV [1.50 (1.22-1.84)] were predictors for sac/val use. As initiation dose in the sac/val cohort, 38% received 24/26 mg, 54% 49/51 mg, and 9% 97/103 mg. Up-titration to the target dose was achieved in 57% of the overall cohort over a median follow-up of 6 months. The estimated treatment persistence for any dose at 360 days was 82%.

conclusionsImplementation of sac/val in Sweden was slow and varied five-fold across different regions; younger age, male, SwedeHF registration, and ischaemic heart disease were among the independent predictors of receiving sac/val. Overall, treatment persistence and tolerability was high.

Indexed as

Real-worldRegistrySacubitril/valsartanSweden

Identifiers

PMID32881399
PMCPMC7754959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.