ArticleESC heart failure2020
Implementation of sacubitril/valsartan in Sweden: clinical characteristics, titration patterns, and determinants.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Ten years real-world experience with sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.ESC heart failure · 2026Pooled it
- Data standards for heart failure: the European Unified Registries for Heart Care Evaluation and Randomized Trials (EuroHeart).European heart journal · 2022Pooled it
- Sacubitril/valsartan in real-life European patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.ESC heart failure · 2021Pooled it
- Treatment Pattern of Heart Failure Patients in Sweden During 2021-2023 in Relation to Updated Treatment Recommendations.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2025Article
- Implementation of guideline-recommended medical therapy for patients with heart failure in Europe.ESC heart failure · 2025Review
- Improving the Management of Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction in Clinical Practice: The Case for Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor.Cardiac failure review · 2025Review
- Heart failure in Europe: Guideline-directed medical therapy use and decision making in chronic and acute, pre-existing and de novo, heart failure with reduced, mildly reduced, and preserved ejection fraction - the ESC EORP Heart Failure III Registry.European journal of heart failure · 2024Article
- Assessment of a systematic approach for implementing novel medications in clinical practice: an observational study with dapagliflozin.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2024Observational
- The management of heart failure in Sweden-the physician's perspective: a survey.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Real-world comparative effectiveness of ARNI versus ACEi/ARB in HF with reduced or mildly reduced ejection fraction.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2023Article
- A machine learning evaluation of patient characteristics associated with prescribing of guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Application of recommended therapies among patients with heart failure during the Syrian conflict: reality and barriers.ESC heart failure · 2022Article
- Regional variation in prescription drug spending: Evidence from regional migrants in Sweden.Health economics · 2022Article
- 'Time is prognosis' in heart failure: time-to-treatment initiation as a modifiable risk factor.ESC heart failure · 2021 · on this mapReview
- Influence of physician networks on prescribing a new ingredient combination in heart failure: a longitudinal claim data-based study.Implementation science : IS · 2021Article
- Implementation of sacubitril/valsartan in Sweden: clinical characteristics, titration patterns, and determinants.ESC heart failure · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThe aim of this study is to study the introduction of sacubitril/valsartan (sac/val) in Sweden with regards to regional differences, clinical characteristics, titration patterns, and determinants of use and discontinuation. METHODS AND
resultsA national cohort of heart failure was defined from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register and National Patient Register. A subcohort with additional data from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry (SwedeHF) was also studied. Cohorts were subdivided as per sac/val prescription and registration in SwedeHF. Median sac/val prescription rate was 20 per 100 000 inhabitants. Between April 2016 and December 2017, we identified 2037 patients with ≥1 sac/val prescription, of which 1144 (56%) were registered in SwedeHF. Overall, patients prescribed with sac/val were younger, more frequently male, and had less prior cardiovascular disease than non-sac/val patients. In SwedeHF subcohort, patients prescribed with sac/val had lower ejection fraction. Overall, younger age [hazard ratio 2.81 (95% confidence interval 2.45-3.22)], registration in SwedeHF [1.97 (1.83-2.12)], male gender [1.50 (1.37-1.64)], ischaemic heart disease [1.50 (1.39-1.62)], lower left ventricular ejection fraction [3.06 (2.18-4.31)], and New York Heart Association IV [1.50 (1.22-1.84)] were predictors for sac/val use. As initiation dose in the sac/val cohort, 38% received 24/26 mg, 54% 49/51 mg, and 9% 97/103 mg. Up-titration to the target dose was achieved in 57% of the overall cohort over a median follow-up of 6 months. The estimated treatment persistence for any dose at 360 days was 82%.
conclusionsImplementation of sac/val in Sweden was slow and varied five-fold across different regions; younger age, male, SwedeHF registration, and ischaemic heart disease were among the independent predictors of receiving sac/val. Overall, treatment persistence and tolerability was high.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.