Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32881344›Full record

ArticlePediatric obesity2020

Positive parenting approaches and their association with child eating and weight: A narrative review from infancy to adolescence.

Katherine N Balantekin, Stephanie Anzman-Frasca, Lori A Francis, Alison K Ventura, Jennifer O Fisher, Susan L Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric obesity, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Family meals and behavioral development: The role of feeding strategies and mealtime emotional climate.Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43) · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katherine N BalantekinDepartment of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6760-2714
Stephanie Anzman-FrascaCenter for Ingestive Behavior Research, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3111-4011
Lori A FrancisDepartment of Biobehavioral Health, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Alison K VenturaDepartment of Kinesiology and Public Health, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California, USA.
Jennifer O FisherCenter for Obesity Research and Education, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Susan L JohnsonDepartment of Pediatrics, University at Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5604-3048

Funding

The Intersection between Loss of Control Eating and Obesity: The Role of Restriction and Food Reinforcement.K01DK120778 · NIDDK · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI BALANTEKIN, KATHERINE NAIME · 2020 to 2024
$785k
NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK120778
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parents play a critical role in the development of children's eating behaviours and weight status, serving as providers, models and regulators of the food environment. Many research reviews have focused on the robust body of evidence on coercive control in feeding: how parenting practices such as restriction and pressure to eat increase children's risk for developing undesirable eating behaviours and unhealthy weight outcomes. Fewer reviews adopt a strengths-based perspective focusing on the ways that parents can actively support the development of healthy eating behaviours and weight trajectories. Emerging research on such positive parenting styles and practices offers solutions beyond the avoidance of coercive control, as well as opportunities to highlight parallels between research on food parenting and the broader, well-established developmental literature on positive parenting. The focus of this review is to summarize what is known regarding benefits of positive parenting styles and practices for child eating and weight outcomes and discuss recommendations for future research. Current evidence supports starting with responsive feeding and parenting during infancy and incorporating structure and limit setting in early childhood, with monitoring and mealtime structure remaining important during middle childhood and adolescence. Areas for future research include: (1) further examination of the implications of identified food parenting practices and styles among diverse groups and caregivers; (2) increased consideration of child factors (eg, temperament) as moderators or mediators; and (3) further clarification of the relationship between general parenting and food parenting.

Indexed as

Body WeightChild BehaviorFeeding BehaviorParentingAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleadolescencechildhoodinfancyparent feedingpositive parenting

Identifiers

PMID32881344
PMCPMC8018716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.