Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32880732›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2021

Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with metastatic cancer not receiving granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis in US clinical practice.

Ahuva Averin, Amanda Silvia, Lois Lamerato, Kathryn Richert-Boe, Manpreet Kaur, Devi Sundaresan, Neel Shah, Mark Hatfield, Tatiana Lawrence, Gary H Lyman and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Secondary Neutropenias.Biomedicines · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Real-world evaluation of supportive care using an electronic health record text-mining tool: G-CSF use in breast cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Ahuva AverinPolicy Analysis Inc. (PAI), Four Davis Court, Brookline, MA, 02445, USA.
Amanda SilviaPolicy Analysis Inc. (PAI), Four Davis Court, Brookline, MA, 02445, USA.
Lois LameratoHenry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
Kathryn Richert-BoeKaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA.
Manpreet KaurHenry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
Devi SundaresanReliant Medical Group, Worcester, MA, USA.
Neel ShahAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Mark HatfieldAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Tatiana LawrenceAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Gary H LymanFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Derek WeyckerPolicy Analysis Inc. (PAI), Four Davis Court, Brookline, MA, 02445, USA. dweycker@pai2.com.
Amgen (United States) · USPolicy Analysis (United States) · USHenry Ford Health System · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USKaiser Permanente · USReliant Medical Group · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis in US patients with selected metastatic cancers and chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN) incidence and associated outcomes among the subgroup who did not receive prophylaxis.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted at four US health systems and included adults with metastatic cancer (breast, colorectal, lung, non-Hodgkin lymphoma [NHL]) who received myelosuppressive chemotherapy (2009-2017). Patients were stratified by FN risk level based on risk factors and chemotherapy (low/unclassified risk, intermediate risk without any risk factors, intermediate risk with ≥ 1 risk factor [IR + 1], high risk [HR]). G-CSF use was evaluated among all patients stratified by FN risk, and FN/FN-related outcomes were evaluated among patients who did not receive first-cycle G-CSF prophylaxis.

resultsAmong 1457 metastatic cancer patients, 20.5% and 28.1% were classified as HR and IR + 1, respectively. First-cycle G-CSF prophylaxis use was 48.5% among HR patients and 13.9% among IR + 1 patients. In the subgroup not receiving first-cycle G-CSF prophylaxis, FN incidence in cycle 1 was 7.8% for HR patients and 4.8% for IR + 1 patients; during the course, corresponding values were 16.9% and 15.9%. Most (> 90%) FN episodes required hospitalization, and mortality risk ranged from 7.1 to 26.9% across subgroups.

conclusionIn this retrospective study, the majority of metastatic cancer chemotherapy patients for whom G-CSF prophylaxis is recommended did not receive it; FN incidence in this subgroup was notably high. Patients with elevated FN risk should be carefully identified and managed to ensure appropriate use of supportive care.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemotherapy-Induced Febrile NeutropeniaFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleNeoplasms, Second PrimaryRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsUnited StatesBreast cancerColorectal cancerFebrile neutropeniaGranulocyte colony-stimulating factorLung cancerNon-Hodgkin lymphoma

Identifiers

PMID32880732
PMCPMC7892737
OpenAlexW3083763733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.