Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32880658›Full record

ArticleDer Nervenarzt2021

[Personnel assessment in psychiatry and psychotherapy : Results of a feasibility study on the platform model].

A Deister, P Brückner-Bozetti, G Heuft, M Kölch, M Klein, M Löhr, A Richert, I Hauth

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

A DeisterZentrum für Psychosoziale Medizin, Klinikum Itzehoe, Itzehoe, Deutschland. a.deister@kh-itzehoe.de.
P Brückner-BozettiForum für Gesundheitswirtschaft gGmbH/e. V., Bremen, Deutschland.
G HeuftKlinik für Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Deutschland.
M KölchKlinik für Psychiatrie, Neurologie, Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie im Kindes- und Jugendalter, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Rostock, Deutschland.
M KleinZentrum für Psychiatrie, Klinikum Schloß Winnenden, Winnenden, Deutschland.
M LöhrLWL-Klinikum Gütersloh, Gütersloh, Deutschland.
A RichertAlexianer St. Hedwig Kliniken, Berlin, Deutschland.
I HauthAlexianer St. Joseph-Krankenhaus, Berlin, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The topic of personnel assessment in psychiatry, psychotherapy and psychosomatics is currently of great importance in terms of health policy. Sufficient empirical evidence for the development of a comprehensive system for staffing is not yet available. The platform model developed by the psychiatric psychosomatic societies and associations pursues a combined empirical normative approach for a future-oriented assessment instrument for the various professional groups. The concept presented has been proven in the health policy discussion as a sensible system of comprehensive personnel assessment; however, an empirically sound control is still lacking as to whether this system can be used practically for the task described and thus can withstand the task of a resilient and future-proof measurement instrument for the necessary personnel. The task of the present study was to examine the extent to which the assumptions of the platform model are confirmed, whether methodological indications can be identified and whether there are limitations of the study that can be used in the validation and foundation of the model. The study confirmed the feasibility of the model and refers to a number of methodological findings and limitations that can be used for the further development of the model. The developed model allows the necessary staffing to be derived and justified, regardless of diagnoses and settings. It is future-oriented and dynamic.

Indexed as

PsychiatryFeasibility StudiesHumansPsychophysiologic DisordersPsychotherapyWorkforceActivity profileAssessment instrumentsHealth policyPatient-oriented needsPsychiatric care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.