Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32880616›Full record

ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2020

Cost-effectiveness of Autonomous Point-of-Care Diabetic Retinopathy Screening for Pediatric Patients With Diabetes.

Risa M Wolf, Roomasa Channa, Michael D Abramoff, Harold P Lehmann

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05463289 (Implementing Digital Retinal Exams Into Comprehensive Pediatric Diabetes Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 50 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05463289 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Implementing Digital Retinal Exams Into Comprehensive Pediatric Diabetes Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityRan2022 to 2026Enrolled500ConditionsType 1 Diabetes, Type 2 Diabetes, Cystic Fibrosis-related DiabetesArmsPoint of Care Autonomous AI diabetic retinopathy exam
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Implications of conscious AI in primary healthcare.Family medicine and community health · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Risa M WolfDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Roomasa ChannaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Michael D AbramoffDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The University of Iowa, Iowa City.
Harold P LehmannDivision of Health Sciences Informatics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Johns Hopkins University · USBaylor College of Medicine · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Screening for diabetic retinopathy is recommended for children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D), yet screening rates remain low. Point-of-care diabetic retinopathy screening using autonomous artificial intelligence (AI) has become available, providing immediate results in the clinic setting, but the cost-effectiveness of this strategy compared with standard examination is unknown. Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of detecting and treating diabetic retinopathy and its sequelae among children with T1D and T2D using AI diabetic retinopathy screening vs standard screening by an eye care professional (ECP). Design, Setting, and Participants: In this economic evaluation, parameter estimates were obtained from the literature from 1994 to 2019 and assessed from March 2019 to January 2020. Parameters included out-of-pocket cost for autonomous AI screening, ophthalmology visits, and treating diabetic retinopathy; probability of undergoing standard retinal examination; relative odds of undergoing screening; and sensitivity, specificity, and diagnosability of the ECP screening examination and autonomous AI screening. Main Outcomes and Measures: Costs or savings to the patient based on mean patient payment for diabetic retinopathy screening examination and cost-effectiveness based on costs or savings associated with the number of true-positive results identified by diabetic retinopathy screening. Results: In this study, the expected true-positive proportions for standard ophthalmologic screening by an ECP were 0.006 for T1D and 0.01 for T2D, and the expected true-positive proportions for autonomous AI were 0.03 for T1D and 0.04 for T2D. The base case scenario of 20% adherence estimated that use of autonomous AI would result in a higher mean patient payment ($8.52 for T1D and $10.85 for T2D) than conventional ECP screening ($7.91 for T1D and $8.20 for T2D). However, autonomous AI screening was the preferred strategy when at least 23% of patients adhered to diabetic retinopathy screening. Conclusions and Relevance: These results suggest that point-of-care diabetic retinopathy screening using autonomous AI systems is effective and cost saving for children with diabetes and their caregivers at recommended adherence rates.

Indexed as

AdolescentArtificial IntelligenceChildCost-Benefit AnalysisDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic RetinopathyFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningPoint-of-Care SystemsRetrospective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32880616
PMCPMC7489415
OpenAlexW3082547533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.