ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2020
Cost-effectiveness of Autonomous Point-of-Care Diabetic Retinopathy Screening for Pediatric Patients With Diabetes.
Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05463289 (Implementing Digital Retinal Exams Into Comprehensive Pediatric Diabetes Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 50 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Implementing Digital Retinal Exams Into Comprehensive Pediatric Diabetes Care
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of screening modalities for early detection of diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of tele-ophthalmology, AI-based tools, and conventional methods.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Economic evaluation of AI-assisted technologies in healthcare: A systematic review.Journal of food and drug analysis · 2025Pooled it
- Transformative applications of oculomics-based AI approaches in the management of systemic diseases: A systematic review.Journal of advanced research · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence improves follow-up appointment uptake for diabetic retinal assessment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eye (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- The Reporting Quality of Machine Learning Studies on Pediatric Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Autonomous artificial intelligence increases screening and follow-up for diabetic retinopathy in youth: the ACCESS randomized control trial.Nature communications · 2024Trial
- Screening for diabetic retinopathy with artificial intelligence in a primary care setting: a comparative cost analysis.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Impact of artificial intelligence on the availability, accessibility, acceptability and quality of ophthalmic disease screening services: a scoping review.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Evaluating commercial multimodal AI for diabetic eye screening and implications for an alternative regulatory pathway.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Medical Imaging Data Strategies for Catalyzing AI Medical Device Innovation.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Current status and solutions for AI ethics in ophthalmology: a bibliometric analysis.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Transparency and Validity of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Pediatric Diabetes: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Targeted Interventions Lead to Quality Improvement in Year 2 of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Diabetic Retinopathy Detection Program in Northern California.Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2025Article
- [Artificial intelligence in medicine-Opportunities and risks from an ethical perspective].Die Ophthalmologie · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Ophthalmology.JMA journal · 2025Review
- Cost-effectiveness of AI for pediatric diabetic eye exams from a health system perspective.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Autonomous Artificial Intelligence for Diabetic Eye Disease Testing Improves Access and Equity in the Pediatric and Adult Populations: The Johns Hopkins Medicine Experience.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2025Article
- Implications of conscious AI in primary healthcare.Family medicine and community health · 2024Review
- Evaluating ChatGPT's Capabilities on Orthopedic Training Examinations: An Analysis of New Image Processing Features.Cureus · 2024Article
- Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-Up Study (NYC-SIGHT): Subanalysis of Referral to Ophthalmology.Current eye research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Screening for diabetic retinopathy is recommended for children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D), yet screening rates remain low. Point-of-care diabetic retinopathy screening using autonomous artificial intelligence (AI) has become available, providing immediate results in the clinic setting, but the cost-effectiveness of this strategy compared with standard examination is unknown. Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of detecting and treating diabetic retinopathy and its sequelae among children with T1D and T2D using AI diabetic retinopathy screening vs standard screening by an eye care professional (ECP). Design, Setting, and Participants: In this economic evaluation, parameter estimates were obtained from the literature from 1994 to 2019 and assessed from March 2019 to January 2020. Parameters included out-of-pocket cost for autonomous AI screening, ophthalmology visits, and treating diabetic retinopathy; probability of undergoing standard retinal examination; relative odds of undergoing screening; and sensitivity, specificity, and diagnosability of the ECP screening examination and autonomous AI screening. Main Outcomes and Measures: Costs or savings to the patient based on mean patient payment for diabetic retinopathy screening examination and cost-effectiveness based on costs or savings associated with the number of true-positive results identified by diabetic retinopathy screening. Results: In this study, the expected true-positive proportions for standard ophthalmologic screening by an ECP were 0.006 for T1D and 0.01 for T2D, and the expected true-positive proportions for autonomous AI were 0.03 for T1D and 0.04 for T2D. The base case scenario of 20% adherence estimated that use of autonomous AI would result in a higher mean patient payment ($8.52 for T1D and $10.85 for T2D) than conventional ECP screening ($7.91 for T1D and $8.20 for T2D). However, autonomous AI screening was the preferred strategy when at least 23% of patients adhered to diabetic retinopathy screening. Conclusions and Relevance: These results suggest that point-of-care diabetic retinopathy screening using autonomous AI systems is effective and cost saving for children with diabetes and their caregivers at recommended adherence rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.