Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32880584›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020

Current Challenges of Digital Health Interventions in Pakistan: Mixed Methods Analysis.

Abdul Momin Kazi, Saad Ahmed Qazi, Nazia Ahsan, Sadori Khawaja, Fareeha Sameen, Muhammad Saqib, Muhammad Ayub Khan Mughal, Zabin Wajidali, Sikander Ali, Rao Moueed Ahmed and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Abdul Momin Kazi *Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-8253-1777
Saad Ahmed Qazi *Department of Electrical Engineering, NED University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-1522-0677
Nazia AhsanDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-4200-3918
Sadori KhawajaDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-3049-9979
Fareeha SameenNED University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-8675-9963
Muhammad SaqibNED University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-8151-6428
Muhammad Ayub Khan MughalDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-0473-2992
Zabin WajidaliDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-1656-5116
Sikander AliBiomedical Department, NED University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-3270-1314
Rao Moueed AhmedNED University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-0735-5387
Hussain KalimuddinDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-6244-9063
Yasir RaufDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-7862-8530
Fatima MahmoodDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-0449-076X
Saad ZafarRiphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-0527-5914
Tufail Ahmad AbbasiRiphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-6271-9366
Khalil-Ur-Rahmen KhoumbatiUniversity of Sindh, Jamshoro, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-7103-1379
Munir A AbbasiSurrey Business School, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7141-0312
Lampros K Stergioulas *Surrey Business School, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8615-2253

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital health is well-positioned in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) to revolutionize health care due, in part, to increasing mobile phone access and internet connectivity. This paper evaluates the underlying factors that can potentially facilitate or hinder the progress of digital health in Pakistan.

objectiveThe objective of this study is to identify the current digital health projects and studies being carried out in Pakistan, as well as the key stakeholders involved in these initiatives. We aim to follow a mixed-methods strategy and to evaluate these projects and studies through a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis to identify the internal and external factors that can potentially facilitate or hinder the progress of digital health in Pakistan.

methodsThis study aims to evaluate digital health projects carried out in the last 5 years in Pakistan with mixed methods. The qualitative and quantitative data obtained from field surveys were categorized according to the World Health Organization's (WHO) recommended building blocks for health systems research, and the data were analyzed using a SWOT analysis strategy.

resultsOf the digital health projects carried out in the last 5 years in Pakistan, 51 are studied. Of these projects, 46% (23/51) used technology for conducting research, 30% (15/51) used technology for implementation, and 12% (6/51) used technology for app development. The health domains targeted were general health (23/51, 46%), immunization (13/51, 26%), and diagnostics (5/51, 10%). Smartphones and devices were used in 55% (28/51) of the interventions, and 59% (30/51) of projects included plans for scaling up. Artificial intelligence (AI) or machine learning (ML) was used in 31% (16/51) of projects, and 74% (38/51) of interventions were being evaluated. The barriers faced by developers during the implementation phase included the populations' inability to use the technology or mobile phones in 21% (11/51) of projects, costs in 16% (8/51) of projects, and privacy concerns in 12% (6/51) of projects.

conclusionsWe conclude that while digital health has a promising future in Pakistan, it is still in its infancy at the time of this study. However, due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there is an increase in demand for digital health and implementation of health outcomes following global social distancing protocols, especially in LMICs. Hence, there is a need for active involvement by public and private organizations to regulate, mobilize, and expand the digital health sector for the improvement of health care systems in countries.

Indexed as

Coronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19HumansPakistanPandemicsPneumonia, ViralTelemedicinedigital healtheHealthLMICsmHealthPakistanSWOTtelehealth

Identifiers

PMID32880584
PMCPMC7499163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.