Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32880169›Full record

ArticleChemical research in toxicology2020

Emerging Chemicals of Health Concern in Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems.

Binnian Wei, Richard J O'Connor, Maciej Lukasz Goniewicz, Andrew Hyland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical research in toxicology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Vaping Dose, Device Type, and E-Liquid Flavor are Determinants of DNA Damage in Electronic Cigarette Users.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Binnian WeiDivision of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, New York 14263, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8076-1202
Richard J O'ConnorDivision of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, New York 14263, United States.
Maciej Lukasz GoniewiczDivision of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, New York 14263, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6748-3068
Andrew HylandDivision of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, New York 14263, United States.

Funding

Emerging Chemicals of Concern in Evolving Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsR21ES030028 · NIEHS · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI O'CONNOR, RICHARD J · 2018 to 2019
$468k
NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES030028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), by virtue of their highly engineered construction (plastics, glass, e-liquids), may contain a number of emerging chemicals of concern (ECCs), including phthalates, phenolic compounds, and flame retardants. Current knowledge regarding the safety of ENDS may underestimate the health risks from ECCs. In this study, we examined the types and levels of those three groups of chemicals in the components and parts of ENDS devices, including refill liquids, tanks/cartridges, atomizers, drip tips/mouthpieces, and sealing materials. Our results suggest that phthalates were the most prevalent chemicals in all tested samples, followed by parabens and organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs). Particularly, all measured chemicals had significantly higher detection rates in cartridges/tanks, drip tips/mouthpieces, and sealing materials in contrast to e-liquids and coil samples. Among all those three types of ENDS components, phthalates generally had the highest concentrations (0.279-3790 ng/unit) in the drip tip/mouthpiece samples, followed by the sealing materials (0.380-508.8 ng/unit) and the empty tank/cartridge samples (up to 761.7 ng/unit). For parabens, highest concentrations were observed in drip tip/mouthpiece samples (1.152-130.1 ng/unit), followed by sealing materials (0.220-30.08 ng/unit) and the tank/cartridge samples (1.794-34.24 ng/unit). For OPFRs, tris(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate had the highest concentrations (39.40-774.1 ng/unit) in all component samples. High concentrations (20.25-260.4 ng/unit) were also observed for several OPFRs in sealing materials and drip tip/mouthpiece samples. These findings will contribute to addressing the information gaps pertinent to the presence of ECCs in ENDS and will warrant further studies for understanding the potential negative health effects and to what extent those chemicals may cause potential negative health effects when using the ENDS. The findings will also contribute to developing evidence-based standards for the regulatory control of the types and levels of ECCs in ENDS products.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsFlame RetardantsHumansPhenolsPhthalic AcidsFlame RetardantsPhenolsPhthalic Acids

Identifiers

PMID32880169
PMCPMC7582622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.