Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32880089›Full record

ArticleCell and tissue banking2024

Use of collagen and auricular cartilage in bioengineering: scaffolds for tissue regeneration.

Lívia Contini Massimino, Virginia da Conceição Amaro Martins, Valcinir Aloisio Scalla Vulcani, Éverton Lucas de Oliveira, Mariane Barsi Andreeta, Tito José Bonagamba, Maria Fátima Guarizo Klingbeil, Monica Beatriz Mathor, Ana Maria de Guzzi Plepis

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cell and tissue banking, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lívia Contini MassiminoInterunit Graduate Program in Bioengineering, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, SP, Brazil. livia.cm@usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6085-9528
Virginia da Conceição Amaro MartinsSão Carlos Institute of Chemistry, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Valcinir Aloisio Scalla VulcaniAnatomy Laboratory, Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Goiás, Jataí, GO, Brazil.
Éverton Lucas de OliveiraSão Carlos Institute of Physics, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Mariane Barsi AndreetaSão Carlos Institute of Physics, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Tito José BonagambaSão Carlos Institute of Physics, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Maria Fátima Guarizo KlingbeilNuclear and Energy Research Institute (IPEN-CNEN/SP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Monica Beatriz MathorNuclear and Energy Research Institute (IPEN-CNEN/SP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Maria de Guzzi PlepisInterunit Graduate Program in Bioengineering, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRNational Nuclear Energy Commission · BRUniversidade Federal de Jataí · BR

Funding

Centro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Leopoldo Américo Miguez de Mello (Cenpes/Petrobras) ANP 2014/00389-8Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 140215/2015-8Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 308076/2018-4Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Finance Code 001International Atomic Energy Agency through the IAEA 18283 (2014-2019)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was the development of collagen and collagen/auricular cartilage scaffolds for application in dermal regeneration. Collagen was obtained from bovine tendon by a 72 h-long treatment, while bovine auricular cartilage was treated for 24 h and divided into two parts, external (perichondrium, E) and internal (elastic cartilage, I). The scaffolds were prepared by mixing collagen (C) with the internal part (CI) or the external part (CE) in a 3:1 ratio. Differential scanning calorimetry, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis, microcomputed tomography imaging (micro-CT) and swelling degree were used to characterize the scaffolds. Cytotoxicity, cell adhesion, and cell proliferation assays were performed using the cell line NIH/3T3. All samples presented a similar denaturation temperature (Td) around 48 °C, while CE presented a second Td at 51.2 °C. SEM micrographs showed superficial pores in all scaffolds and micro-CT exhibited interconnected pore spaces with porosity above 60% (sizes between 47 and 149 µm). The order of swelling was CE < CI < C and the scaffolds did not present cytotoxicity, showing attachment rates above 75%-all samples showed a similar pattern of proliferation until 168 h, whereas CI tended to decrease after this time. The scaffolds were easily obtained, biocompatible and had adequate morphology for cell growth. All samples showed high adhesion, whereas collagen-only and collagen/external part scaffolds presented a better cell proliferation rate and would be indicated for possible use in dermal regeneration.

Indexed as

Tissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBioengineeringCattleCell ProliferationCollagenEar CartilagePorosityX-Ray MicrotomographyBiocompatible MaterialsCollagenBiopolymersCell proliferationElastinMicro-CT

Identifiers

PMID32880089
OpenAlexW3081872273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.