Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32880044›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

Multimarker approach to assess the exposure of the wild rodent Calomys laucha to a simulated crude oil spill.

Krissia Aparecida de Almeida, Edariane Menestrino Garcia, Julia Oliveira Penteado, Ronan Adler Tavella, Caroline Lopes Feijo Fernandes, Paula Florencio Ramires, Osmar Vieira Ramires Júnior, Ana Luíza Muccillo-Baisch, Maria da Luz Mathias, Deodália Dias and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Exploring the effects of microalgal biomass on the oil behavior in a sand-water system.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Krissia Aparecida de AlmeidaLaboratório de Ensaios Farmacológicos e Toxicológicos, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, Brazil.
Edariane Menestrino GarciaLaboratório de Ensaios Farmacológicos e Toxicológicos, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, Brazil.
Julia Oliveira PenteadoLaboratório de Ensaios Farmacológicos e Toxicológicos, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, Brazil.
Ronan Adler TavellaLaboratório de Ensaios Farmacológicos e Toxicológicos, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, Brazil.
Caroline Lopes Feijo FernandesLaboratório de Ensaios Farmacológicos e Toxicológicos, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, Brazil.
Paula Florencio RamiresLaboratório de Ensaios Farmacológicos e Toxicológicos, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, Brazil.
Osmar Vieira Ramires JúniorPrograma de Pós Graduação em Bioquímica, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Ana Luíza Muccillo-BaischLaboratório de Ensaios Farmacológicos e Toxicológicos, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, Brazil.
Maria da Luz MathiasDepartment of Animal Biology, Faculty of Sciences of the University of Lisbon & CESAM - Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, Campo Grande, 1749-016, Lisbon, Portugal.
Deodália DiasDepartment of Animal Biology, Faculty of Sciences of the University of Lisbon & CESAM - Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, Campo Grande, 1749-016, Lisbon, Portugal.
Flavio Manoel Rodrigues da Siva JúniorLaboratório de Ensaios Farmacológicos e Toxicológicos, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, Brazil. f.m.r.silvajunior@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7344-4679
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande · BRUniversity of Lisbon · PTUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior UID/AMB/50017/2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A mysterious oil spill occurred in the ocean near Brazil in 2019, which affected coastal areas in northeastern Brazil. When oil pollution occurs in coastal zones, organisms such as small mammals can suffer deleterious effects to their health. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of exposure to contaminated sandy soil with different crude oil concentrations in males of the species Calomys laucha. The exposure to crude oil resulted in multiple health issues for the subjects in the very first days of exposure. Furthermore, the exposure resulted in mutagenic damage to bone marrow blood cells and behavioral and morphological alterations, which were almost always in a dose-dependent form. The present study demonstrates the sensibility of the biomarkers used and highlights that small wild mammals such as C. laucha are useful for predicting environmental damage caused by the exposure to crude oil.

Indexed as

PetroleumPetroleum PollutionAnimalsBrazilMaleRodentiaPetroleumCalomys lauchaEnvironmental pollutionMammalsMutagenicityPhysiological damage

Identifiers

PMID32880044
OpenAlexW3081713123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.