Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32880036›Full record

ArticleChild psychiatry and human development2021

Measuring What Matters to Individuals with Angelman Syndrome and Their Families: Development of a Patient-Centered Disease Concept Model.

Tom Willgoss, Daiana Cassater, Siobhan Connor, Michelle L Krishnan, Meghan T Miller, Carla Dias-Barbosa, Dawn Phillips, Julie McCormack, Lynne M Bird, Rebecca D Burdine and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child psychiatry and human development, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Caregiver Meaningful Score Differences and Meaningful Score Regions for the Observer-Reported Communication Ability Measure for Individuals with Angelman Syndrome.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Community-Sourced Reporting of Mortalities in Angelman Syndrome (1979-2022).American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Tom WillgossRoche Products Limited, Hexagon Place, 6 Falcon Way, Shire Park, Welwyn Garden City, AL7 1TW, UK. tom.willgoss@roche.com.
Daiana CassaterRoche Innovation Center Basel, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Siobhan ConnorRoche Products Limited, Hexagon Place, 6 Falcon Way, Shire Park, Welwyn Garden City, AL7 1TW, UK.
Michelle L KrishnanRoche Innovation Center Basel, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Meghan T MillerRoche Innovation Center Basel, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Carla Dias-BarbosaEvidera, Hammersmith, London, UK.
Dawn PhillipsDivision of Physical Therapy, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Julie McCormackEvidera, Patient-Centered Research, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Lynne M BirdDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Rebecca D BurdineDepartment of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Sharon ClaridgeFoundation for Angelman Syndrome Research (FAST), Downers Grove, IL, USA.
Terry Jo BichellConsortium for Outcome Measures and Biomarkers for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Nashville, TN, USA.
Roche (Switzerland) · CHGramercy Research Group (United States) · USHexagon (United Kingdom) · GBNeuroDevelopment Center · USPrinceton University · USRoche (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Angelman syndrome (AS) is a complex, heterogeneous, and life-long neurodevelopmental disorder. Despite the considerable impact on individuals and caregivers, no disease-modifying treatments are available. To support holistic clinical management and the development of AS-specific outcome measures for clinical studies, we conducted primary and secondary research identifying the impact of symptoms on individuals with AS and their unmet need. This qualitative research adopted a rigorous step-wise approach, aggregating information from published literature, then evaluating it via disease concept elicitation interviews with clinical experts and caregivers. We found that the AS-defining concepts most relevant for treatment included: impaired expressive communication, seizures, maladaptive behavior, cognitive impairment, motor function difficulties, sleep disturbance, and limited self-care abilities. We highlight the relevance of age in experiencing these key AS concepts, and the difference between the perceptions of clinicians and caregivers towards the syndrome. Finally, we outline the impact of AS on individuals, caregivers, and families.

Indexed as

Angelman SyndromeCaregiversHumansModels, TheoreticalPatient-Centered CareQualitative ResearchAngelman syndromeClinical endpointOutcome assessmentPatient-centeredQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID32880036
PMCPMC8238699
OpenAlexW3082704458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.