Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32879816›Full record

ArticleCureus2020

Trends of Industry Payments in Neurology Subspecialties.

Krishna Nalleballe, Karthika Durga Veerapaneni, Yohei Harada, Poornachand Veerapaneni, Narenraj Arulprakash, Jose R Lopez-Castellanos, Sen Sheng, Julia Rowen, Vasuki Dandu, Sanjeeva Onteddu and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Krishna NalleballeNeurology/Stroke, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS), Little Rock, USA.
Karthika Durga VeerapaneniNeurology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS), Little Rock, USA.
Yohei HaradaNeurology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS), Little Rock, USA.
Poornachand VeerapaneniNeurology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS), Little Rock, USA.
Narenraj ArulprakashNeurology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS), Little Rock, USA.
Jose R Lopez-CastellanosNeurology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS), Little Rock, USA.
Sen ShengNeurology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS), Little Rock, USA.
Julia RowenPharmacy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS), Little Rock, USA.
Vasuki DanduNeurology, Baptist Health Medical Center, Little Rock, USA.
Sanjeeva OntedduNeurology/Stroke, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS), Little Rock, USA.
Suman SiddamreddyInternal Medicine, Baptist Health Medical Center, Little Rock, USA.
Baptist Health Foundation · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USUniversity of Arkansas Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Open Payments is a national disclosure program to promote transparency by the public disclosure of financial relationships between the pharmaceutical and medical device industries and physicians. Objective To explore payments from the industry to physicians in various neurology subspecialties. Methods Open Payments Program (OPP) data (https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov) on industry-to-physician payments for the years 2014-2018 were extracted for general neurology, neuromuscular, neurophysiology, and vascular neurology. The data were then analyzed to explore trends in payments for various subspecialties and to identify the possible factors underlying these trends. Results Overall, industry-to-physician payments for neurology subspecialties increased by 16% from 2014 to 2018. The introduction of newer drugs in a subspecialty was likely the driving factor for higher industry payments. Nearly half of the total industry-to-physician payments were for the subspecialty of multiple sclerosis (MS)/Neuroimmunology; this coincided with Aubagio and Copaxone being the top two medications associated with the highest industry payments in 2014, Aubagio, and Lemtrada in 2018. A significant increase in spending percentages for headache, neuromuscular disorders, and movement disorders was observed while a relative decrease in the payments for MS/neuroimmunology and epilepsy was identified; these trends coincide with the introduction of new drugs such as Aimovig, Neuplazid, Nusinersen, and Austedo for headache, neuromuscular and movement disorders. Conclusions From 2014 to 2018, the total industry-to-physician payments for neurology subspecialties increased while the distribution of industry-to-physician payments for various neurology subspecialties showed notable changes. The introduction of newer medications in a subspecialty coincided with higher industry payments. Identification of these trends and potential motives of the industry spending is critical to address any potential physician bias in prescribing medications.

Indexed as

disparitieshealth economicsindustry paymentneurologistopen payment program

Identifiers

PMID32879816
PMCPMC7458713
OpenAlexW3046288487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.