Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32879801›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2020

A comparison of COVID-19, SARS and MERS.

Tingting Hu, Ying Liu, Mingyi Zhao, Quan Zhuang, Linyong Xu, Qingnan He

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Reinfection in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review.Global health research and policy · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Guillain Barre Syndrome as a Complication of COVID-19: A Systematic Review.The Canadian journal of neurological sciences. Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Clinical Outcomes of Pediatric Cancer Patients with COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of hematology-oncology and stem cell research · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Is single point HbA1c a reliable predictor for death in severe COVID-19?Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tingting Hu *Department of Pediatrics, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Ying Liu *Department of Pediatrics, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Mingyi ZhaoDepartment of Pediatrics, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2884-0736
Quan ZhuangTransplantation Center, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5225-9282
Linyong XuDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, School of Life Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5130-2461
Qingnan HeDepartment of Pediatrics, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Central South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In mid-December 2019, a novel atypical pneumonia broke out in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China and was caused by a newly identified coronavirus, initially termed 2019 Novel Coronavirus and subsequently severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). As of 19 May 2020, a total of 4,731,458 individuals were reported as infected with SARS-CoV-2 among 213 countries, areas or territories with recorded cases, and the overall case-fatality rate was 6.6% (316,169 deaths among 4,731,458 recorded cases), according to the World Health Organization. Studies have shown that SARS-CoV-2 is notably similar to (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus) SARS-CoV that emerged in 2002-2003 and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) that spread during 2012, and these viruses all contributed to global pandemics. The ability of SARS-CoV-2 to rapidly spread a pneumonia-like disease from Hubei Province, China, throughout the world has provoked widespread concern. The main symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) include fever, cough, myalgia, fatigue and lower respiratory signs. At present, nucleic acid tests are widely recommended as the optimal method for detecting SARS-CoV-2. However, obstacles remain, including the global shortage of testing kits and the presentation of false negatives. Experts suggest that almost everyone in China is susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection, and to date, there are no effective treatments. In light of the references published, this review demonstrates the biological features, spread, diagnosis and treatment of SARS-CoV-2 as a whole and aims to analyse the similarities and differences among SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV to provide new ideas and suggestions for prevention, diagnosis and clinical treatment.

Indexed as

Clinical presentationsCOVID-19EpidemiologyLaboratory diagnosisMERS-CoVRadiological featuresSARS-CoV

Identifiers

PMID32879801
PMCPMC7443081
OpenAlexW3057690687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.