New records of a lost species and a geographic range expansion for sengis in the Horn of Africa.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Multi-strata "camera columns": an effective approach to characterize non-volant mammal communities in tropical forests.Journal of mammalogy · 2026
   Article
2. More than one species of the naked mole-rat, a new biomedical model.Communications biology · 2025
   Article
3. Total evidence time-scaled phylogenetic and biogeographic models for the evolution of sea cows (Sirenia, Afrotheria).PeerJ · 2022
   Article
4. Widespread loss of mammalian lineage and dietary diversity in the early Oligocene of Afro-Arabia.Communications biology · 2021
   Article
5. New records of a lost species and a geographic range expansion for sengis in the Horn of Africa.PeerJ · 2020
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as