Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32879769›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2020

Development of a Quantitative Immunoassay for Tear Lacritin Proteoforms.

Brooke M Justis, Casey E Coburn, Ethan M Tyler, Ryan S Showalter, Brianna J Dissler, Melissa Li, Nancy A McNamara, Gordon W Laurie, Robert L McKown

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Site-specific O-glycans influence lacritin structure and multimerization in tears.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brooke M JustisSchool of Integrated Sciences, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA USA.
Casey E CoburnSchool of Integrated Sciences, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA USA.
Ethan M TylerSchool of Integrated Sciences, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA USA.
Ryan S ShowalterSchool of Integrated Sciences, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA USA.
Brianna J DisslerSchool of Integrated Sciences, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA USA.
Melissa LiSchool of Optometry and Vision Science Program, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Nancy A McNamaraSchool of Optometry and Vision Science Program, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Gordon W LaurieDepartment of Cell Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Robert L McKownSchool of Integrated Sciences, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA USA.
James Madison University · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

Tear Protein Microbial RegulationR01EY026171 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI LAURIE, GORDON WILLIAM · 2016 to 2025
$3.6M
Defining the role of the nervous system in aqueous-deficient dry eyeR01EY025980 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KNOX, SARAH MONICA, MCNAMARA, NANCY A · 2015 to 2019
$2.0M
Lacritin Regulated Ocular Surface HomeostasisR01EY024327 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI LAURIE, GORDON WILLIAM · 2014 to 2017
$1.8M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024327NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025980NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026171
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Lacritin is a tear glycoprotein with pro-tearing and pro-ocular surface homeostasis activities that is selectively deficient in most dry eye tears. Proteoforms include an active monomer, inactive polymers, and a splice variant termed lacritin-c. Quantitation of the different proteoforms of tear lacritin may provide a diagnostic tool for ocular diseases. Here, we report the development of an immunoassay for the quantification of multiple lacritin proteoforms in human tear samples. Methods: Basal tears collected on Schirmer test strips with anesthesia were eluted by diffusion and centrifugation under optimized conditions. Tear protein concentrations were determined, and 2.56 µg of each sample was separated by SDS-PAGE followed by western blot analysis. Blots were challenged with anti-Pep Lac N-term antibodies. Detection was with fluorescent secondary antibodies visualized by the LI-COR Odyssey CLx imaging system and quantified with standard curves of recombinant lacritin. Results: The percent total lacritin (ng lacritin/100 ng total protein) ranged from 1.8% to 14.8%. Monomer, lacritin-c, and polymer proteoform percent total protein ranged from 1.1% to 6.3%, 0.3% to 5.4%, and 0.7% to 5.7%, respectively. Monomer lacritin was detected at concentrations of 6 to 176 µM, with lacritin-c and polymer proteoforms at 2 to 46 µM and 1 to 23 µM, respectively. Conclusions: This assay greatly exceeds the power and sensitivity of our prior lacritin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay that was not capable of distinguishing monomer from polymers and lacritin-c proteoforms. Translational Relevance: A new method has been developed to quantitate multiple proteoforms of tear lacritin in preparation for analyses of samples from clinical trials.

Indexed as

Dry Eye SyndromesEye ProteinsBlotting, WesternGlycoproteinsHumansTearsEye ProteinsGlycoproteinsdry eyequantitative immunoassaytear lacritin proteoforms

Identifiers

PMID32879769
PMCPMC7442861
OpenAlexW3047535781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.