Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32879754›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2020

Evidence Based Prediction and Progression Monitoring on Retinal Images from Three Nations.

Lutfiah Al Turk, Su Wang, Paul Krause, James Wawrzynski, George M Saleh, Hend Alsawadi, Abdulrahman Zaid Alshamrani, Tunde Peto, Andrew Bastawrous, Jingren Li and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Fenofibrate and diabetic retinopathy.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Classification of Elementary Oral Lesions from Clinical Images.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lutfiah Al TurkDepartment of Statistics, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Su WangDepartment of Computer Science, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK.
Paul KrauseDepartment of Computer Science, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK.
James WawrzynskiNIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfield Eye Hospital and the UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.
George M SalehNIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfield Eye Hospital and the UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.
Hend AlsawadiFaculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman Zaid AlshamraniOphthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Tunde PetoCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
Andrew BastawrousInternational Centre for Eye Health, Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Jingren Li7th Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Diabetes Professional Committee of China, Geriatric Health Association, P.R. China.
Hongying Lilian TangDepartment of Computer Science, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this work is to demonstrate how a retinal image analysis system, DAPHNE, supports the optimization of diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening programs for grading color fundus photography. Method: Retinal image sets, graded by trained and certified human graders, were acquired from Saudi Arabia, China, and Kenya. Each image was subsequently analyzed by the DAPHNE automated software. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for the detection of referable DR or diabetic macular edema were evaluated, taking human grading or clinical assessment outcomes to be the gold standard. The automated software's ability to identify co-pathology and to correctly label DR lesions was also assessed. Results: In all three datasets the agreement between the automated software and human grading was between 0.84 to 0.88. Sensitivity did not vary significantly between populations (94.28%-97.1%) with specificity ranging between 90.33% to 92.12%. There were excellent negative predictive values above 93% in all image sets. The software was able to monitor DR progression between baseline and follow-up images with the changes visualized. No cases of proliferative DR or DME were missed in the referable recommendations. Conclusions: The DAPHNE automated software demonstrated its ability not only to grade images but also to reliably monitor and visualize progression. Therefore it has the potential to assist timely image analysis in patients with diabetes in varied populations and also help to discover subtle signs of sight-threatening disease onset. Translational Relevance: This article takes research on machine vision and evaluates its readiness for clinical use.

Indexed as

Diabetic RetinopathyMacular EdemaChinaHumansKenyaSaudi ArabiaAI algorithmdeep learningdiabetesdiabetic retinopathylesion detection

Identifiers

PMID32879754
PMCPMC7443119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.