Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32879689›Full record

ArticleJournal of graduate medical education2020

Residency Practice Transformation: Implementation of Team-Based Care in an Academic Continuity Clinic.

Andrew Coyle, Ania Wajnberg, Mary Fishman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of graduate medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew Coyle
Ania Wajnberg
Mary Fishman
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTeam-based primary care has the potential to improve care delivery. However, residency scheduling and precepting models make creating functional ambulatory teams challenging.

objectiveWe describe the team-based care transformation at a large academic internal medicine residency practice.

methodsOn July 1, 2016, the program transitioned to a 6+2 schedule and the clinic was divided into teams. Residents were precepted by 2 team preceptors, social work and care coordination needs were met by team-specific staff, and front desk staff were trained on maintaining primary care physician (PCP) and team continuity. Weekly team meetings provided opportunities for proactive patient and panel management, and preclinic huddles incorporated staff into team functions. Pre-transformation (June 2016) and post-transformation (June 2017) surveys were distributed to residents (n = 131), faculty (n = 14), and staff (n = 65) to assess team functioning. Patient-PCP continuity was monitored on a quarterly basis.

resultsThree hundred sixty-two of 420 surveys were returned (86%). The intervention was associated with significant improvements in resident satisfaction (from 3.05 baseline to 4.07 of 5,

conclusionsTeam-based care was implemented with significant improvements in continuity and resident satisfaction and perceptions of teamwork; however, the impact on faculty and staff was limited.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Care FacilitiesAttitude of Health PersonnelContinuity of Patient CareHumansInternal MedicineInternship and ResidencyNew York CityPatient Care TeamPhysicians, Primary CarePreceptorshipPrimary Health CareSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID32879689
PMCPMC7450747
OpenAlexW3042956288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.