Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32879666›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology2020

Clinical and pathological characteristics and prognosis of 132 cases of rectal neuroendocrine tumors.

Yong-Jun Yu, Yu-Wei Li, Yang Shi, Zhao Zhang, Min-Ying Zheng, Shi-Wu Zhang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumor With Non-Atypical Mucous Cell Glands: A Case Report.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Primary tumor location (rightTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yong-Jun YuDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin 300121, China.
Yu-Wei LiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin 300121, China.
Yang ShiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin 300121, China.
Zhao ZhangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin 300121, China.
Min-Ying ZhengDepartment of Pathology, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin 300121, China.
Shi-Wu ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin 300121, China. zhangshiwu666@aliyun.com.
Tianjin People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeuroendocrine tumors (NETs) frequently occur in the gastrointestinal tract, lung, and pancreas, and the rectum and appendix are the sites with the highest incidence. Epidemiology statistics show that an estimated 8000 people every year in the United States are diagnosed with NETs occurring in the gastrointestinal tract, including the stomach, intestine, appendix, colon, and rectum. The pathological changes and clinical symptoms of NETs are not specific, and therefore they are frequently misdiagnosed.

aimTo investigate the clinical symptoms, pathological characteristics, treatment, and prognosis of rectal neuroendocrine tumors (RNETs) by analyzing the clinical and pathological data of 132 RNET cases at our hospital.

methodsAll RNETs were graded according to Ki-67 positivity and mitotic events. The tumors were staged as clinical stages I, II, III, and IV according to infiltrative depth and tumor size. COX proportional hazard model was used to assess the main risk factors for survival.

resultsThese 132 RNETs included 83 cases of G1, 21 cases of G2, and 28 cases of G3 (neuroendocrine carcinoma) disease. Immunohistochemical staining showed that 89.4% of RNETs were positive for synaptophysin and 39.4% positive for chromogranin A. There were 19, 85, 23, and 5 cases of clinical stages I, II, III, and IV, respectively. The median patient age was 52.96 years. The diameter of tumor, depth of invasion, and pathological grade were the main reference factors for the treatment of RNETs. The survival rates at 6, 12, 36, and 60 mo after operation were 98.5%, 94.6%, 90.2%, and 85.6%, respectively. Gender, tumor size, tumor grade, lymph node or distant organ metastasis, and radical resection were the main factors associated with prognosis of RNETs. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor size and grade were independent prognostic factors.

conclusionThe clinical symptoms of RNETs are not specific, and they are easy to misdiagnose. Surgery is the main treatment method. The grade and stage of RNETs are the main indices to evaluate prognosis.

Indexed as

Neuroendocrine carcinomaNeuroendocrine tumorsPrognosisTumor gradeTumor sizeUnivariate analysis

Identifiers

PMID32879666
PMCPMC7443838
OpenAlexW3048812669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.