Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32879641›Full record

ArticleDisease markers2020

Detection of BRAF V600E Mutation in Ganglioglioma and Pilocytic Astrocytoma by Immunohistochemistry and Real-Time PCR-Based Idylla Test.

Justyna Durślewicz, Anna Klimaszewska-Wiśniewska, Paulina Antosik, Anna Kasperska, Dariusz Grzanka, Tadeusz Szylberg, Łukasz Szylberg

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disease markers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Molecular features in gangliogliomas: a systematic review.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Assessment of the Influence of UVR in Cutaneous Melanoma.Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Comparison of Two Rapid Assays for the Detection ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Case report:Frontiers in medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Justyna DurślewiczDepartment of Clinical Pathomorphology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, 85-092 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Anna Klimaszewska-WiśniewskaDepartment of Clinical Pathomorphology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, 85-092 Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8493-3806
Paulina AntosikDepartment of Clinical Pathomorphology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, 85-092 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Anna KasperskaDepartment of Clinical Pathomorphology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, 85-092 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Dariusz GrzankaDepartment of Clinical Pathomorphology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, 85-092 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Tadeusz Szylberg10th Military Research Hospital and Polyclinic, 85-681 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Łukasz SzylbergDepartment of Clinical Pathomorphology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, 85-092 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Nicolaus Copernicus University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The BRAF V600E mutation is an important oncological target in certain central nervous system (CNS) tumors, for which a possible application of BRAF-targeted therapy grows continuously. In the present study, we aim to determine the prevalence of BRAF V600E mutations in a series of ganglioglioma (GG) and pilocytic astrocytoma (PA) cases. Simultaneously, we decided to verify whether the combination of fully automated tests-BRAF-VE1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Idylla BRAF mutation assay-may be useful to accurately predict it in the case of specified CNS tumors. The study included 49 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues, of which 15 were GG and 34 PA. Immunohistochemistry with anti-BRAF V600E (VE1) antibody was performed on tissue sections using the VentanaBenchMark ULTRA platform. All positive or equivocal cases on IHC and selected negative ones were further assessed using the Idylla BRAF mutation assay coupled with the Idylla platform. The BRAF-VE1 IHC was positive in 6 (6/49; 12.3%) and negative in 39 samples (39/49; 79.6%). The interpretation of immunostaining results was complicated in 4 cases, of which 1 tested positive for the Idylla BRAF mutation assay. Therefore, the overall positivity rate was 14.3%. This included 2 cases of GG and 5 cases of PA. Our study found that BRAF V600E mutations are moderately frequent in PA and GG and that for these tumor entities, IHC VE1 is suitable for screening purposes, but all negative, equivocal, and weak positive cases should be further tested with molecular biology techniques, of which the Idylla system seems to be a promising tool.

Indexed as

MutationAdolescentAdultAgedAstrocytomaAutomation, LaboratoryBrain NeoplasmsChildFemaleGangliogliomaHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedParaffin EmbeddingProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafBRAF protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf

Identifiers

PMID32879641
PMCPMC7448243
OpenAlexW3054709648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.