Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32879593›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterology

Outcomes of over-the-scope clip application in various gastrointestinal indications: experience from a tertiary care in India.

Radhika Chavan, Zaheer Nabi, Arun Karayampudi, Nitin Jagtap, Shujaath Asif, Raghvendra Yaralagadda, Jahangeer Basha, Sundeep Lakhtakia, Manu Tandan, Mohan Ramchandani and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Radhika ChavanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.
Zaheer NabiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.
Arun KarayampudiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.
Nitin JagtapDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.
Shujaath AsifDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.
Raghvendra YaralagaddaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.
Jahangeer BashaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.
Sundeep LakhtakiaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.
Manu TandanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.
Mohan RamchandaniDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.
D Nageshwar ReddyDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent advances in endoscopic tools and techniques have allowed the minimally invasive management of iatrogenic gastrointestinal (GI) perforations and bleedings. However, surgery may be required in cases with larger defects and bleeding refractory to conventional endoscopic modalities. The use of over-the-scope clips (OTSC) has been shown to improve the outcomes in these patients compared with conventional treatment modalities. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of OTSC for different indications in the GI tract.

methodsThe data of consecutive patients in whom OTSC was utilized for different indications between February 2017 and October 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. The following outcomes were recorded: technical and clinical success, and adverse events related to the procedure.

resultsThirty-six patients (22 male, mean age 52.673±14.97 years, range 11-72 years) underwent OTSC application. Indications for OTSC were: GI defects (perforation n=13, fistula n=5); esophageal metallic stent fixing n=9; GI bleeding n=8; and neuroendocrine tumor endotherapy n=1. The average size of the defect was 15.88±8.01 mm. The technical and clinical success rates were 88.89% and 83.33%, respectively. There were 4 (11.1%) technical failures: colonic perforations n=2; duodenal ulcer bleeding n=1; and esophageal metal stent fixation n=1. There were 2 (9.5%) adverse events, including 1 partial duodenal obstruction and 1 delayed bleeding.

conclusionsThe use of OTSC is safe, easy and effective for various indications in the GI tract. Prospective trials are required to see if the use of OTSC is cost effective as a primary endoscopic treatment method in these cases.

Indexed as

bleedingEndoscopyfull-thickness resectionperforation

Identifiers

PMID32879593
PMCPMC7406817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.