Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32879579›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma

Osteochondromas of the cervical spine-case series and review.

R Rajakulasingam, J Murphy, R Botchu, S L James

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Anatomy and Pathologies of the Spinous Process.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. Primary Benign Neoplasms of the Spine.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Primary Osseous Malignancies of the Spine.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R RajakulasingamRoyal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
J MurphyRoyal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
R BotchuRoyal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
S L JamesRoyal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Royal Orthopaedic Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCervical spine osteochondromas are rare with approximately 3% of solitary and 7-9% of hereditary osteochondromas occurring in the spine. Almost 50% of spinal osteochondromas occur in the cervical region.

methodsA search of osteochondroma of cervical spine was performed of our radiology database.

resultsIn this study, we present 11 cases of adult cervical spine osteochondromas. These predominantly involved the posterior elements. The cartilage cap was more than 2 cm in 2 cases. There was cord compression in 1 case, foraminal narrowing in 2 patients and vertebral artery compression in 1 case. 6 patients underwent excision with majority being osteochondroma. There was only one case of chondrosarcoma.

conclusionOsteochondromas of cervical spine and extremely rare and symptomatology are due to mass effect. One should be aware of this entitly when analysing cervical spine for neck pain or lump.

Indexed as

Benign tumoursCervicalOsteochondroma

Identifiers

PMID32879579
PMCPMC7452280
OpenAlexW2997964766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.