ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2020
Rapid Detection and Characterization of Carbapenemases in
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emergence ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- An improved method for rapid detection and characterization of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales directly from positive blood cultures: dBLIMplus.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Detection of OXA-23 and OXA-58 inMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Paradoxical carbapenemase activity detected by modified carbapenemase inactivation (mCIM) method inJournal of clinical microbiology · 2025Article
- Determining the cytotoxicity of the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of silver and zinc oxide nanoparticles in ESBL and carbapenemase producing Proteus mirabilis isolated from clinical samples in Shiraz, Southwest Iran.BMC research notes · 2024Article
- Detection and Characterization of Carbapenemases inFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- High-Speed Quenching Probe-Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for the Rapid Detection of Carbapenemase-Producing Gene Using GENECUBE: A Fully Automatic Gene Analyzer.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The worldwide emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance in Gram-negative bacteria are severely limiting therapeutic options and thus constitute a major public health threat. The timely accurate detection of carbapenemase producers and the determination of carbapenemase class according to the Ambler classification can guide antimicrobial therapy and facilitate infection control measures. A modified version of the carbapenemase inactivation method (CIM), mCIM, was described and approved by the CLSI in 2017. We evaluated the performance of a faster new mCIM-based assay, mCIMplus, which can detect carbapenemase activity within 8 h and characterize the carbapenemase according to the Ambler classification in 20 h. A panel of 137 isolates producing carbapenemases (GES, IMP, KPC, NDM, OXA-48, OXA-48-like, and VIM enzymes) and 22 non-carbapenemase-producing isolates was used to evaluate the performance of mCIMplus. We evaluated the detection of carbapenemase activity at 8 and 20 h. Carbapenemase class was determined, with specific inhibitors, at 20 h. The sensitivities of mCIMplus were 99.3% at 8 h and 98.5% at 20 h. Its specificity was 100% regardless of culture time. Based on a decision algorithm, this test successfully identified the carbapenemase class for 98.4% of the tested isolates (127/129). Characterization was correct for 100, 95, and 100% of Ambler class A, B, and D isolates, respectively. This test can, therefore, be used to detect carbapenemase activity within 8 h and to determine carbapenemase class within 20 h. It constitutes a very affordable (<€1 per isolate) and reliable technique requiring only basic laboratory equipment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.