ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2020
Optogenetic Stimulation of Type I GAD65
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Response characteristics of oral mechanosensory neurons in the mouse trigeminal ganglion.Chemical senses · 2025Article
- Give-and-take of gustation: the interplay between gustatory neurons and taste buds.Chemical senses · 2024Review
- The elusive cephalic phase insulin response: triggers, mechanisms, and functions.Physiological reviews · 2023Review
- Sodium Intake and Disease: Another Relationship to Consider.Nutrients · 2023Review
- Oral thermal processing in the gustatory cortex of awake mice.Chemical senses · 2023Article
- Analysis of the rat chorda tympani nerve response to "super salty" sodium carbonate.Chemical senses · 2023Article
- METTL3-mediated mInternational journal of oral science · 2022Article
- Taste Receptor Signaling.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2022Article
- Pharmacology of T2R Mediated Host-Microbe Interactions.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2022Article
- Type II/III cell composition and NCAM expression in taste buds.Cell and tissue research · 2021Article
- Functional expression of TMEM16A in taste bud cells.The Journal of physiology · 2021Article
- Cellular Diversity and Regeneration in Taste Buds.Current opinion in physiology · 2021Article
- Whole-Mount Staining, Visualization, and Analysis of Fungiform, Circumvallate, and Palate Taste Buds.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2021Article
- GAD65Cre Drives Reporter Expression in Multiple Taste Cell Types.Chemical senses · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Mammalian taste buds are comprised of specialized neuroepithelial cells that act as sensors for molecules that provide nutrition (e.g., carbohydrates, amino acids, and salts) and those that are potentially harmful (e.g., certain plant compounds and strong acids). Type II and III taste bud cells (TBCs) detect molecules described by humans as "sweet," "bitter," "umami," and "sour." TBCs that detect metallic ions, described by humans as "salty," are undefined. Historically, type I glial-like TBCs have been thought to play a supportive role in the taste bud, but little research has been done to explore their role in taste transduction. Some evidence implies that type I cells may detect sodium (Na
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.