Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32878898›Full record

ArticleESMO open2020

SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in oncology healthcare professionals and patients with cancer at a tertiary care centre during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Thorsten Fuereder, Anna Sophie Berghoff, Gerwin Heller, Helmuth Haslacher, Thomas Perkmann, Robert Strassl, Julia Maria Berger, Hannah Christina Puhr, Judith Kreminger, Florian Moik and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. MUW researcher of the month.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thorsten FuerederDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Anna Sophie BerghoffDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gerwin HellerDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Helmuth HaslacherDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Thomas PerkmannDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Robert StrasslDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Julia Maria BergerDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Hannah Christina PuhrDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Judith KremingerDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Florian MoikClinical Division of Haematology and Haemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Lorenz SchubertDivision of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Angelika Martina StarzerDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ariane SteindlDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Stefan WinklerDivision of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Matthias PreusserDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Selma TobudicDivision of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: selma.tobudic@meduniwien.ac.at.
Medical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the COVID-19 outbreak, healthcare professionals (HCP) are at the frontline of clinical management and at increased risk for infection. The SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence of oncological HCP and their patients has significant implications for oncological care.

methodsHCP and patients with cancer at the Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna were included between 21 March and 4 June and tested for total antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 employing the Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay. Reactive samples were confirmed or disproved by the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG test. Additionally, a structured questionnaire regarding basic demographic parameters, travel history and COVID-19-associated symptoms had to be completed by HCP.

results146 subjects (62 HCP and 84 patients with cancer) were enrolled. In the oncological HCP cohort, 20 (32.3%) subjects were medical oncologists, 28 (45.2%) nurses at our ward and 14 (22.6%) fulfil other functions such as study coordinators. In the patient cohort, most individuals are on active anticancer treatment (96.4%). 26% of the HCP and 6% of the patients had symptoms potentially associated with COVID-19 since the end of February 2020. However, only in 2 (3.2%) HCP and in 3 (3.6%) patients, anti-SARS-Cov-2 total antibodies were detected. The second assay for anti-SARS-Cov-2 IgG antibodies confirmed the positive result in all HCP and in 2 (2.4%) patients, suggesting an initial assay's unspecific reaction in one case. In individuals with a confirmed test result, an active COVID-19 infection was documented by a positive SARS-CoV-2 RNA PCR test.

conclusionSpecific anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were found solely in persons after a documented SARS-CoV-2 viral infection, thus supporting the test methods' high sensitivity and specificity. The low prevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in our cohorts indicates a lack of immunity against SARS-CoV-2. It highlights the need for continued strict safety measures to prevent uncontrolled viral spread among oncological HCPs and patients with cancer.

Indexed as

Clinical Laboratory TechniquesMedical Staff, HospitalOncology Service, HospitalPatientsSerologic TestsTertiary Care CentersAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, ViralAustriaBetacoronavirusBiomarkersCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Antibodies, ViralBiomarkersCOVID-19healthcare professionalsSARS-COV-2seroprevalence

Identifiers

PMID32878898
PMCPMC7470513
OpenAlexW3082161675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.