Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32878763›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Patient education materials for non-specific low back pain and sciatica: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bradley Furlong, Kris Aubrey-Bassler, Holly Etchegary, Andrea Pike, Georgia Darmonkow, Michelle Swab, Amanda Hall

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Impact of education in patients undergoing physiotherapy for lower back pain: a level I systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bradley FurlongPrimary Healthcare Research Unit, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, Newfoundland, Canada bradley.furlong@mun.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-2013-7624
Kris Aubrey-BasslerPrimary Healthcare Research Unit, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, Newfoundland, Canada.
Holly EtchegaryClinical Epidemiology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada.
Andrea PikePrimary Healthcare Research Unit, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, Newfoundland, Canada.
Georgia DarmonkowClinical Epidemiology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada.
Michelle SwabHealth Sciences Library, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada.
Amanda HallPrimary Healthcare Research Unit, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, Newfoundland, Canada.
Memorial University of Newfoundland · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLow back pain accounts for more disability than any other musculoskeletal condition and is associated with severe economic burden. Patients commonly present with negative beliefs about low back pain and this can have detrimental effects on their health outcomes. Providing evidence-based, patient-centred education that meets patient needs could help address these negative beliefs and alleviate the substantial low back pain burden. The primary aim of this review is to investigate the effectiveness of patient education materials on immediate process, clinical and health system outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The search strategy was developed in collaboration with a librarian and systematic searches will be performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and SPORTDiscus. We will also search trial registries and grey literature through the OpenGrey database. Study selection will include a title and abstract scan and full-text review by two authors. Only randomised controlled trials will be included in this review. Trials must include patients with low back pain or sciatica and investigate educational interventions with at least one of the following contrasts: (1) education alone versus no intervention; (2) education alone versus another intervention; (3) education in addition to another intervention versus the same intervention with no education. Data extraction, risk of bias and grading of the quality of evidence will be performed independently by two reviewers. Risk of bias will be assessed using the PEDro scale, and the quality of evidence will be assessed with the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. A random-effects model will be used for each contrast, and results will be pooled if the participants, interventions, and outcomes are homogeneous. If heterogeneity is high (I ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this review. This study, along with its results, will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Indexed as

Low Back PainPersons with DisabilitiesSciaticaHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicPatient Education as TopicReview Literature as Topicepidemiologyhealth economicsprimary care

Identifiers

PMID32878763
PMCPMC7470487
OpenAlexW3082553559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.